The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy
Open accessAbstract
This paper interrogates the currently pervasive discourse of the ‘net generation’ finding the concept of the ‘digital native’ especially problematic, both empirically and conceptually. We draw on a research project of South African higher education students' access to and use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to show that age is not a determining factor in students' digital lives; rather, their familiarity and experience using ICTs is more relevant. We also demonstrate that the notion of a generation of ‘digital natives’ is inaccurate: those with such attributes are effectively a digital elite. Instead of a new net generation growing up to replace an older analogue generation, there is a deepening digital divide in South Africa characterized not by age but by access and opportunity; indeed, digital apartheid is alive and well. We suggest that the possibility for digital democracy does exist in the form of a mobile society which is not age specific, and which is ubiquitous. Finally, we propose redefining the concepts ‘digital’, ‘net’, ‘native’, and ‘generation’ in favour of reclaiming the term ‘digitizen’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 · Cited by 11,104
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
(2012) · From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning · doi:10.4135/9781483387765.n6 · Cited by 7,107
Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Wilson, R. D., & Creswell, J. W. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152153 · Cited by 7,080
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently?
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424843 · Cited by 4,035
The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x · Cited by 2,971
Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation
Tapscott, D. (1997) · Cited by 2,728
Oblinger, D. G., Oblinger, J. L., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 2,274
Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research
LIEBERMAN, E. S. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051762 · Cited by 1,515 · cited 1×
“Phase 3 in 2009 adopted a nested case study approach (Lieberman 2005) involving a short survey of 513 students identified as types through the previous phases across six universities.”
MethodResearch Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Magnan, S. S., & Creswell, J. W. (1997) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328794 · Cited by 873
THE INCORPORATION OF EFFECT SIZE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, LEARNING, AND PERFORMANCE RESEARCH
Kotrlik, J. W., & Williams, H. A. (2003) · Cited by 329
Cited by
Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?
Ng, W. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 · Cited by 1,621
Lembani, R., Gunter, A., Breines, M., & Dalu, M. T. B. (2020) · Journal of Geography in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03098265.2019.1694876 · Cited by 292
Kaleimamoowahinekapu Galla, C. (2018) · Language and Literacy · doi:10.20360/langandlit29412 · Cited by 39
Issues for eHealth in Psychiatry: Results of an Expert Survey
Nicholas, J., Huckvale, K., Larsen, M. E., Basu, A., Batterham, P. J., Shaw, F., & Sendi, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6957 · Cited by 34
Yildiz Durak, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2020) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12790 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-15
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 357-369
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W2105609257
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 35.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x
- The paper
- Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00369.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
