The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature
Abstract
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) has been introduced as a conceptual framework for the knowledge base teachers need to effectively teach with technology. The framework stems from the notion that technology integration in a specific educational context benefits from a careful alignment of content, pedagogy and the potential of technology, and that teachers who want to integrate technology in their teaching practice therefore need to be competent in all three domains. This study is a systematic literature review about TPACK of 55 peer‐reviewed journal articles (and one book chapter), published between 2005 and 2011. The purpose of the review was to investigate the theoretical basis and the practical use of TPACK. Findings showed different understandings of TPACK and of technological knowledge. Implications of these different views impacted the way TPACK was measured. Notions about TPACK in subject domains were hardly found in the studies selected for this review. Teacher knowledge (TPACK) and beliefs about pedagogy and technology are intertwined. Both determine whether a teacher decides to teach with technology. Active involvement in (re)design and enactment of technology‐enhanced lessons was found as a promising strategy for the development of TPACK in (student‐)teachers. Future directions for research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1 · Cited by 6,839 · cited 1×
“Self-assessment instruments can be useful as they tend to measure a teacher’s self-efficacy, which usually is a good predictor of actual teacher behaviour (e.g. Tschannen-Moran & Hoy 2001).”
BackgroundProfessional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain
Borko, H. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033008003 · Cited by 4,208
Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)
Graham, C. R. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010 · Cited by 709
Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching
Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(02)00003-4 · Cited by 601
A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology
Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/14759390400200183 · Cited by 386
Cited by
What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205741319300303 · Cited by 2,790
A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age
Starkey, L. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2019.1625867 · Cited by 492
Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Review
Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663 · Cited by 473
Teachers' AI-TPACK: exploring the relationship between knowledge elements
Ning, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16030978 · Cited by 330
McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9337-2 · Cited by 161
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-121
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W1900422729
- Cited by
- 1,095
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 288.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
- The paper
- Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.