The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species
Abstract
1 Vegetation removal manipulations over four growing seasons in an alpine Dryas heath at Finse, south Norway, were used to examine the role of neighbour vegetation in the population dynamics of the forb Thalictrum alpinum and the sedge Carex vaginata. We also increased temperature (by open top chambers) and nutrient availability to assess if effects of surrounding vegetation may be modified by environmental change. 2 Removal of neighbour vegetation increased the number of leaves of Thalictrum and Carex, whereas flowering stems and leaf stalks of Thalictrum became significantly shorter. Furthermore, increased plant growth after nutrient addition and warming suggests that both abiotic environmental conditions and biotic interactions limit plant growth at Finse. 3 Our results suggest that there is competition for nutrients at Finse, but that surrounding vegetation may also have facilitative sheltering effects on other species. 4 Interactions between vegetation removal and abiotic factors on population dynamic parameters of Thalictrum suggest that plant–plant interactions may be modified if temperature and nutrient availability increase under climate change. 5 The responses of the two target species to the removal of the general neighbour vegetation were less pronounced than their responses to the removal of the dominant Dryas octopetala examined in a previous study. This suggests that one dominant species may affect the population dynamics of other species more than the net effect of all the other species in the community in concert. 6 Our results show that biotic interactions may affect alpine plant populations and thereby structure alpine plant communities. Furthermore, the effects of neighbours and abiotic environmental changes on alpine plant growth may depend on the species identity of the neighbours.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754 · cited 1×
“It is also possible that interactions (positive or negative) from other species have a low impact on population dynamics compared with direct impacts from abiotic environmental conditions (e.g. Savile 1960; Billings & Mooney 1968; Grime 1977).”
BackgroundPlant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Positive interactions in communities
Bertness, M. D., & Callaway, R. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 · Cited by 3,823
Experiments in ecology their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance
Underwood, A. J. (1997) · Cited by 3,799
Hatfield, J. L. (1998) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700010038x · Cited by 2,871
Körner, C. (1999) · Cited by 2,682
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Weaver, T., & Grime, J. P. (1980) · Journal of Range Management · doi:10.2307/3898436 · Cited by 2,548
Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-0924 · Cited by 2,299
COMPETITION AND FACILITATION: A SYNTHETIC APPROACH TO INTERACTIONS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES
Callaway, R. M., & Walker, L. R. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1958:cafasa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,016
Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress
Callaway, R. M., Brooker, R. W., Choler, P., Kikvidze, Z., Lortie, C. J., Michalet, R., Paolini, L., Pugnaire, F. I., Newingham, B., Aschehoug, E. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00812 · Cited by 1,874
Cited by
Van Der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D., & Van Straalen, N. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x · Cited by 5,053
Wisz, M. S., Pottier, J., Kissling, W. D., Pellissier, L., Lenoir, J., Damgaard, C. F., Dormann, C. F., Forchhammer, M. C., Grytnes, J., Guisan, A., et al. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00235.x · Cited by 1,769
Plant–soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges
van der Putten, W. H., Bardgett, R. D., Bever, J. D., Bezemer, T. M., Casper, B. B., Fukami, T., Kardol, P., Klironomos, J. N., Kulmatiski, A., Schweitzer, J. A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12054 · Cited by 1,758
HIERRO, J. L., MARON, J. L., & CALLAWAY, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x · Cited by 836
MacDougall, A. S., Gilbert, B., & Levine, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01514.x · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- KLANDERUD, K., & TOTLAND, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 493-501
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2067593414
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01000.x
- The paper
- KLANDERUD, K., & TOTLAND, O. (2005). The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01000.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.