Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disentangling above‐ and below‐ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest

Open access
SCHNITZER, STEFAN A., KUZEE, MIRJAM E., BONGERS, FRANS·2005·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Light is thought to be the most limiting resource in tropical forests, and thus above‐ground competition is commonly accepted as the mechanism that structures these communities. In many tropical forests, trees compete not only with other trees, but also with lianas, which compete aggressively for below‐ground resources and thus may limit tree growth and regeneration. Using a replicated experiment, we tested the relative strengths of above‐ and below‐ground competition from lianas on tree saplings in a disturbed forest in Côte d’Ivoire with a heterogeneous canopy and relatively high light penetration. We planted seedlings of three tree species and subjected them to below‐ground competition with lianas (BGC), above‐ and below‐ground competition with lianas (ABGC), or a liana‐free control treatment. After 2 years, we harvested the saplings and compared the amount of above‐ground biomass and its relative allocation among the three experimental treatments and different tree species. Lianas competed intensely with saplings in this tropical forest, substantially limiting sapling growth. Saplings grown in the ABGC and BGC treatments had only 18.5% and 16.8% of the above‐ground dry biomass of those grown in the liana‐free control treatment. Sapling biomass did not differ significantly among the ABGC and BGC treatments, suggesting that below‐ground competition was the driving force behind liana vs. tree competition in this forest. Above‐ground competition with lianas, however, did affect the allocation of biomass in saplings, resulting in shorter, thicker stems and a poorly developed crown. Collectively, our findings suggest that below‐ground competition with lianas plays a substantial role in limiting the growth of saplings in disturbed and secondary tropical forests, and above‐ground effects may be due to a combination of above‐ground competition and mechanical stress. Disentangling above‐ and below‐ground competition between lianas and trees is critical for a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of naturally regenerating tropical forests, as well as formulating successful management plans for sustainable timber harvest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01056.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
SCHNITZER, S. A., KUZEE, M. E., & BONGERS, F.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-15
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
1115-1125
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W1727228474
Cited by
279
References
54
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disentangling above‐ and below‐ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01056.x
The paper
SCHNITZER, S. A., KUZEE, M. E., & BONGERS, F. (2005). Disentangling above‐ and below‐ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01056.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.