Cited by 24Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Beyond evidence‐based medicine: complexity and stories of maternity care

Downe, Soo·2010·Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01357.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Downe, S.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Downe, Soo
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
232-237
ISSN
  • 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2753
OpenAlex
W1977261112
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
obstetric care, complexity, stories, evidence-based medicine, childbirth
MeSH terms
Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Midwifery, Models, Biological, Pregnancy, Systems Theory, Nonlinear Dynamics, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review