Cited by 22Healthcare Quality and ManagementOrganizational Learning and LeadershipOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies

Enhancing Learning, Innovation, Adaptation, and Sustainability in Health Care Organizations: The ELIAS Performance Management Framework

Persaud, D. David·2014·The Health Care Manager

Abstract

The development of sustainable health care organizations that provide high-quality accessible care is a topic of intense interest. This article provides a practical performance management framework that can be utilized to develop sustainable health care organizations. It is a cyclical 5-step process that is premised on accountability, performance management, and learning practices that are the foundation for a continuous process of measurement, disconfirmation, contextualization, implementation, and routinization This results in the enhancement of learning, innovation, adaptation, and sustainability (ELIAS). Important considerations such as recognizing that health care organizations are complex adaptive systems and the presence of a dynamic learning culture are necessary contextual factors that maximize the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Importantly, the ELIAS framework utilizes data that are already being collected by health care organizations for accountability, improvement, evaluation, and strategic purposes. Therefore, the benefit of the framework, when used as outlined, would be to enhance the chances of health care organizations achieving the goals of ongoing adaptation and sustainability, by design, rather than by chance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/hcm.0000000000000014

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches to monitoring included diverse areas to assess including having appropriate data to document progress, having a management or monitoring system in place, and having regular reporting and feedback mechanisms.

    “Approaches to monitoring included diverse areas to assess including having appropriate data to document progress [64, 65], having a management or monitoring system in place [15, 53, 61, 66, 67], and having regular reporting and feedback mechanisms [46, 47, 52, 54, 68, 69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Persaud, D. D.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Persaud, D. David
Venue
The Health Care Manager
Published
2014-07
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
183-204
ISSN
1525-5794 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053995607
Cited by
22
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Health Care Manager (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Keywords
performance management, learning organization, innovation, organizational adaptation, accountability, complex adaptive systems, learning culture, continuous improvement, routinization, quality of care
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning, Organizational Innovation, Social Responsibility, Program Evaluation, Models, Organizational, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Facility Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review