The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know
Abstract
Background Over the past two decades the concept of quality of life (QOL) has increasingly become a focus for research and application in the fields of education/special education, health care (physical and behavioural), social services (disabilities and ageing), and families. Methods This article summarizes our current understanding of the construct of individual QOL as it pertains to persons with intellectual disabilities (ID). The article's three major sections discuss what we know, what we are beginning to understand, and what we still do not know about the QOL construct. Results We currently know the importance of the QOL construct as a service delivery principle, along with its current use and multidimensional nature. We are beginning to understand the importance of methodological pluralism in the assessment of QOL, the multiple uses of quality indicators, the predictors of assessed QOL, the effects of different data collection strategies, and the etic (universal) and emic (culture‐bound) properties of the construct. We have yet to understand fully the use of QOL‐related outcomes in programme change, how to best evaluate the outcomes of QOL‐related services, and how to use the concept of QOL to impact public and disability reform. Conclusion The article concludes with a brief discussion of future challenges related to demonstrating the concept's social validity and positive impact on the lives of persons with ID.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
(1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k · Cited by 7,643
Social Indicators of Well-Being
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5 · Cited by 3,653
The funds, friends, and faith of happy people.
Myers, D. G. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.56 · Cited by 1,179
Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning
Carroll, J. B., Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421762 · Cited by 1,154
The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos
Cummins, R. A. (1996) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00292050 · Cited by 962
Schalock, R. L., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R. A., Felce, D., Matikka, L., Keith, K. D., & Parmenter, T. (2002) · Mental Retardation · doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0457:cmaaoq>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 666
Self-citationMyers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1996) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0596-70 · Cited by 665
Measurement of quality of life: current state of the art.
Flanagan, J. C. (1982) · PubMed · Cited by 450
The Second Approximation to an International Standard for Life Satisfaction
Cummins, R. A. (1998) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006831107052 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Quality of life and its measurement: important principles and guidelines
Verdugo, M. A., Schalock, R. L., Keith, K. D., & Stancliffe, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00739.x · Cited by 391
Self-citationRenty, J. O., & Roeyers, H. (2006) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361306066604 · Cited by 302
Hong, J., Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Smith, L. E., Greenberg, J. S., & Mailick, M. R. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2678-0 · Cited by 178
Chiang, H.-M., & Wineman, I. (2014) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.003 · Cited by 150
Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Hong, J., Smith, L. E., Makuch, R. A., Greenberg, J. S., & Mailick, M. R. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2816-3 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Schalock, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-216
- ISSN
- 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2788
- OpenAlex
- W2169433009
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 9.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x
- The paper
- Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.