Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 585

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know

Schalock, R. L.·2004·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

Background Over the past two decades the concept of quality of life (QOL) has increasingly become a focus for research and application in the fields of education/special education, health care (physical and behavioural), social services (disabilities and ageing), and families. Methods This article summarizes our current understanding of the construct of individual QOL as it pertains to persons with intellectual disabilities (ID). The article's three major sections discuss what we know, what we are beginning to understand, and what we still do not know about the QOL construct. Results We currently know the importance of the QOL construct as a service delivery principle, along with its current use and multidimensional nature. We are beginning to understand the importance of methodological pluralism in the assessment of QOL, the multiple uses of quality indicators, the predictors of assessed QOL, the effects of different data collection strategies, and the etic (universal) and emic (culture‐bound) properties of the construct. We have yet to understand fully the use of QOL‐related outcomes in programme change, how to best evaluate the outcomes of QOL‐related services, and how to use the concept of QOL to impact public and disability reform. Conclusion The article concludes with a brief discussion of future challenges related to demonstrating the concept's social validity and positive impact on the lives of persons with ID.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 585

Metadata

Authors
Schalock, R. L.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
203-216
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2169433009
Cited by
585
References
33
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x
The paper
Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.