Cited by 24Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Blink rate in boys with fragile X syndrome: preliminary evidence for altered dopamine function

Roberts, J. E., Symons, F. J., Johnson, A.‐M., Hatton, D. D., Boccia, M. L.·2005·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

Background Dopamine, a neurotransmitter involved in motor and cognitive functioning, can be non‐invasively measured via observation of spontaneous blink rates. Blink rates have been studied in a number of clinical conditions including schizophrenia, autism, Parkinsons, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder with results implicating either hyper or hypo dopaminergic states. Methods This study examined spontaneous blink rate in boys with fragile X syndrome (FXS). Blink rates of boys (4–8 years old) with FXS (n = 6) were compared with those of age‐matched typically developing boys (n = 6) during active and passive tasks. Blink rates (blinks per minute) for each task were compared between the two groups. Then, the relation between blink measures and core FXS‐related features [problem behaviours, arousal, fmr 1 protein (FMRP)] were examined within the group of boys with FXS. Results Blink rate in boys with FXS was significantly higher than typically developing boys during passive tasks. Within the FXS group, there were significant correlations between blink rate and problem behaviours and physiological arousal (i.e. heart activity) but not with FMRP. Conclusions Observed differences in spontaneous blink rate between boys with and without FXS and the relation between blink rate and physiological and behavioural measures in boys with FXS suggests that further work examining dopamine dysfunction as a factor in the pathophysiology of FXS may be warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00713.x

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, J. E., Symons, F. J., Johnson, A. ‐., Hatton, D. D., & Boccia, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-07
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
647-656
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2074648711
Cited by
24
References
66
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FRAXA Research Foundation
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (#HD03110, P30HD003110)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, blink rate, dopaminergic dysfunction, spontaneous eye movements, boys, behavioral problems, physiological arousal, heart rate, FMRP
MeSH terms
Arousal, Attention, Blinking, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Dopamine, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Reference Values, Statistics as Topic, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review