Cited by 214Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The metabolic syndrome: time to get off the merry-go-round?: Review: The metabolic syndrome

Open access
Reaven, G. M.·2011·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

The diagnostic category of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) has received considerable attention over the last decade, and prestigious organizations continue to strive for its incorporation into medical practice. This review has three goals: (i) summarize the history of the several attempts to define a diagnostic category designated as the MetS; (ii) question the aetiological role of abdominal obesity in the development of the other components of the MetS; and (iii) evaluate a diagnosis of the MetS as an effective way to identify apparently healthy individuals at increased risk to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) or type 2 diabetes (2DM). The most important conclusion is that the MetS seems to be less effective in this population than the Framingham Risk Score in predicting CVD, and no better, if not worse, than fasting plasma glucose concentrations in predicting 2DM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02325.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Reaven, G. M.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Reaven, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
269
Issue
2
Pages
127-136
ISSN
0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1492634769
Cited by
214
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 34
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, diagnostic criteria, abdominal obesity, cardiovascular risk, type 2 diabetes, Framingham risk score, fasting blood glucose, risk prediction, etiology
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Risk Assessment, Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, Abdominal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review