The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hospital nurses' job satisfaction: a literature review: Hospital nurses’ job satisfaction
Abstract
AIM: A literature review of nurses' job satisfaction. BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors evoking job satisfaction among nurses, whereas more is known about stress, burnout and dissatisfaction. The positive viewpoint is an important research area and needs to be studied. METHODS: Original studies were accessed by a systematic search from electronic databases (Abi/Inform, PsycINFO, Cinahl and Medline Ovid) using the keywords 'nurses' and 'job satisfaction' and chosen by certain criteria. The data chosen for this review consist of 21 scientific articles. Data were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: and conclusions Most of the studies are quantitative studies, the majority of them were conducted in the United States. Job satisfaction at work varies in different specialty areas of nursing work. Two significant themes in job satisfaction are interpersonal relationships between nurses and patient care. Different ways of organizing work are also relevant for job satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers have a strong role in promoting nurses' job satisfaction: attention should be paid especially to strengthening nurses' interpersonal relationships and facilitate nurses' capacity to deliver high-quality patient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.
Siegrist, J. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 · Cited by 5,713
The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health.
Warr, P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x · Cited by 1,490 · cited 1×
“There are several theoretical models of work stress (Karasek & Theorell 1990, Warr 1990, Siegrist 1996) and some of them have also been studied among health care professionals (De Jonge & Schaufeli 1998, Bakker et al. 2000).”
Background
Cited by
Goulia, P., Mantas, C., Dimitroula, D., Mantis, D., & Hyphantis, T. (2010) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-322 · Cited by 438
HAYES, B., BONNER, A., & PRYOR, J. (2010) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01131.x · Cited by 345
The Key Job Demands and Resources of Nursing Staff: An Integrative Review of Reviews
Broetje, S., Jenny, G. J., & Bauer, G. F. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00084 · Cited by 257
McVicar, A. (2016) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12326 · Cited by 171
Job satisfaction and retention of midwives in rural Nigeria
Adegoke, A. A., Atiyaye, F. B., Abubakar, A. S., Auta, A., & Aboda, A. (2015) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.010 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- UTRIAINEN, K., & KYNGÄS, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Management
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-11-18
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1002-1010
- ISSN
- 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074567606
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 41.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital nurses' job satisfaction: a literature review: Hospital nurses’ job satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01028.x
- The paper
- UTRIAINEN, K., & KYNGÄS, H. (2009). Hospital nurses' job satisfaction: a literature review: Hospital nurses’ job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01028.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
