Cited by 61Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children: OROPHARYNGEAL AIRWAY DIMENSIONS AFTER FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES

RESTREPO, C., SANTAMARÍA, A., PELÁEZ, S., TAPIAS, A.·2011·Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Abstract

Class II skeletal malocclusion and respiratory disorders owing to the obstruction of the upper airway at early growth stages have been correlated. The retro/micrognathism can be treated with functional appliances. However, the effects of an early functional orthopedic treatment on the airway dimensions have not been evaluated before the growth peak. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in the airway dimensions of class II retrognathic children who received treatment with either Klammt or Bionator on a pre-pubertal stage. The sample consisted of 50 lateral cephalograms of class II retrognathic patients in a pre-puberal stage, before and after the use of a Klammt or Bionator II treatment for 1 year. The data were evaluated by Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test, and significance was set at 5% (P < 0·05). When the measurements before and after treatment were compared, a statistically significant increase in the airway dimensions was found at the space where the adenoid tissue was located. The only airway dimensions that increased after treatment with functional appliances were the ones located at the nasopharynx. The adenoid tissue is still in the peak of growing at the ages of the subjects included in this study. However, the measurements along the nasopharynx increased when compared with the initial ones. Still, similar retrospective and prospective studies are needed at older stages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02199.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RESTREPO, C., SANTAMARÍA, A., PELÁEZ, S., & TAPIAS, A.
Affiliations
Universidad CES (CO)
Corresponding author
RESTREPO, C.
Venue
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-05
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
588-594
ISSN
0305-182X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1790170503
Cited by
61
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
Class II malocclusion, functional orthodontic appliances, Bionator, prepubertal children, upper airway obstruction, adenoids, nasopharynx, cephalometric analysis
MeSH terms
Activator Appliances, Cephalometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Mandible, Maxillofacial Development, Oropharynx, Radiography, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Retrognathia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review