Cited by 29Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership

The national suicide prevention strategy for England: the reality of a national strategy for the nursing profession

ANDERSON, M., JENKINS, R.·2006·Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Suicide is recognized as a global phenomenon and many countries now have national suicide prevention strategies. International guidance on suicide prevention and accepted epidemiological and treatment-based research underpins healthcare policy relating to suicide reduction. There has been an established comprehensive strategy in England since 2002. However, the rate of suicide continues to be a concern and nurses hold a key role in the implementation of national, regional and local policy into practice. The aim of this paper is to consider the current implications of the national suicide prevention strategy in England for nursing. This discussion paper draws upon both empirical evidence-based literature, governmental guidance and policy-related documentation. The national suicide prevention strategy for England currently continues to have a multifaceted impact on the nursing profession. This ranges from clinical practice issues such as risk assessment through to broader public health responsibilities. If nurses and allied health professionals are to be effective in their role within suicide prevention, they will need to be supported in building awareness of the wider context of the national policy. In particular, this will mean working effectively and collaboratively with the voluntary sector, service users and other non-medical agencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.01011.x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ANDERSON, M., & JENKINS, R.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
ANDERSON, M.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
641-650
ISSN
  • 1351-0126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2850
OpenAlex
W1971875379
Cited by
29
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Keywords
suicide prevention, national suicide prevention strategy, England, nursing role, health policy implementation, suicide risk assessment, public health responsibility, inter-agency cooperation, voluntary sector, service user involvement
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Cooperative Behavior, England, Goals, Health Policy, Health Priorities, Health Promotion, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Mental Health Services, Nursing Assessment, Organizational Objectives, Psychiatric Nursing, Psychotherapy, State Medicine, Suicide, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review