The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spontaneous viral clearance following acute hepatitis C infection: a systematic review of longitudinal studies
Abstract
Summary. A large number of studies have reported on spontaneous viral clearance rates in acute hepatitis C infection, however most have been small, and reported rates have varied quite widely. To improve the precision of the estimated rate of spontaneous viral clearance, a systematic review was conducted of longitudinal studies. Factors associated with viral clearance were also examined. Inclusion criteria for studies were: longitudinal assessment from time of acute hepatitis C; hepatitis C virus RNA analysis as determinant of viral clearance; untreated for acute hepatitis C. Information on study population, and factors that may influence viral clearance were extracted from each study. Viral clearance was defined among individuals with at least 6 months follow‐up following acute hepatitis C. The number of subjects with viral clearance was expressed as a proportion for each study and a weighted mean for proportion was calculated. A total of 31 studies were examined. Study populations included nine studies of post‐transfusion hepatitis, 19 of acute clinical hepatitis, and three of sero‐incident cases. In total, data was available for 675 subjects and the mean study population was 22 (range 4–67). The proportion with viral clearance ranged from 0.0 to 0.8, with a weighted mean of 0.26 (95% CI 0.22–0.29). Factors associated with viral clearance were female gender and acute clinical hepatitis C study population. Further studies are required to more clearly define predictors of clearance and guide therapeutic intervention strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A long-term study of hepatitis C virus replication in non-A, non-B hepatitis.
Farci, P., Alter, H. J., Wong, D., Miller, R. H., Shih, J. W., Jett, B., & Purcell, R. H. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107113250205 · Cited by 571
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection
(2014) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2013.11.003 · Cited by 855
Estimating Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 2013‐2016
Hofmeister, M. G., Rosenthal, E. M., Barker, L. K., Rosenberg, E. S., Barranco, M. A., Hall, E. W., Edlin, B. R., Mermin, J., Ward, J. W., & Ryerson, A. B. (2019) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.30297 · Cited by 486
Historical review of the causes of cancer
Blackadar, C. B. (2016) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.54 · Cited by 389
MSM starting preexposure prophylaxis are at risk of hepatitis C virus infection.
Hoornenborg, E., Achterbergh, R. C. A., Schim van der Loeff, M. F., Davidovich, U., Hogewoning, A., de Vries, H. J. C., Schinkel, J., Prins, M., & van de Laar, T. J. W. (2017) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000001522 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Micallef, J. M., Kaldor, J. M., & Dore, G. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Viral Hepatitis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-27
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-41
- ISSN
- 1352-0504 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2893
- OpenAlex
- W1985982900
- Cited by
- 871
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spontaneous viral clearance following acute hepatitis C infection: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2005.00651.x
- The paper
- Micallef, J. M., Kaldor, J. M., & Dore, G. J. (2006). Spontaneous viral clearance following acute hepatitis C infection: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Journal of Viral Hepatitis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2005.00651.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.