The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review
Abstract
ABSTRACT. An account is given of work published during the past 10 years incriminating species of phlebotomine sandflies as vectors of Leishmania species which infect man. An assessment is made of the degrees of certainty of the vectorial roles of eighty‐one species and subspecies of sandflies (thirty‐seven Old World and forty‐four New World) in the transmission of twenty‐nine leishmanial parasites of mammals. At least one species of sandfly is considered to be a proven vector of each of ten parasites. Of the eighty‐one sandfly taxa, evidence is judged to be sufficient to incriminate nineteen as proven vectors (eleven Phlebotomus species and eight Lutzomyia species or subspecies) and evidence for a further fourteen (nine Phlebotomus species and five Lutzomyia species or subspecies) is considered to be strong. The suggested criteria for incrimination of a vector are anthropophily and common infection with the same leishmanial parasite as that found in man in the same place. More weight should be given to natural infections persisting after the digestion of a bloodmeal than those in the presence of blood. Supporting evidence is a concordance in the distribution of the fly and the disease in man, proof that the fly feeds regularly on the reservoir host, a flourishing development of the parasite in infected flies and the experimental transmission of the parasite by the bite of the fly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MAROLI, M., FELICIANGELI, M. D., BICHAUD, L., CHARREL, R. N., & GRADONI, L. (2013) · Medical and Veterinary Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01034.x · Cited by 873
Otranto, D., Capelli, G., & Genchi, C. (2009) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-2-s1-s2 · Cited by 177
Mendoza-Roldan, J., Benelli, G., Panarese, R., Iatta, R., Furlanello, T., Beugnet, F., Zatelli, A., & Otranto, D. (2020) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04063-9 · Cited by 119
Seropositivity rates for agents of canine vector-borne diseases in Spain: A multicentre study
Miró, G., Montoya, A., Roura, X., Gálvez, R., & Sainz, A. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-117 · Cited by 97
Mrljak, V., Kuleš, J., Mihaljević, Ž., Torti, M., Gotić, J., Crnogaj, M., Živičnjak, T., Mayer, I., Šmit, I., Bhide, M., et al. (2017) · Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · doi:10.1089/vbz.2016.1990 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- KILLICK‐KENDRICK, R.
- Venue
- Medical and Veterinary Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0269-283X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2915
- OpenAlex
- W2056656305
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00255.x
- The paper
- KILLICK‐KENDRICK, R. (1990). Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00255.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.