Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge
Abstract
Summary. The study compares two popular forms of written tests; the multiple choice test (MCQ) and the Modified Essay Question (MEQ). Two factors were varied in the experiment: the format of the questions (multiple choice, directed free response, or open‐ended free response) and the context of the questions (in a patient problem or in random sequence). Six problems were developed in each version, and administered to a total of 36 medical students at three educational levels using a Latin‐square design. The results showed a significant effect of each factor in the design, amounting to a difference of 8.7% between MCQ and directed free response, 4.2% between directed and open‐ended free response and 4.3% between problem and random context. However, the correlation of scores based on content across the formats approached unity after correction for attenuation. A process score, based on the style and presentation in the undirected format, correlated more strongly with the free‐response questions. The results suggest that, although the MCQ and MEQ may assess different skills, there is a very strong relationship between content scores derived from the two formats. The free response formats may present the opportunity for assessment of other factors related to presentation if scoring procedures are modified. Finally, the effect of randomizing questions is a deterioration of performance when compared to placing questions in the problem context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies of question format showed high correlation between MCQs and OEQs.
“Studies of question format showed high correlation between MCQs and OEQs.40”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning.
Frederiksen, N. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.3.193 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
A comparison of multiple‐choice tests and free‐response tests in examinations of clinical competence
Newble, D. I., BAXTER, A., & Elmslie, R. G. (1979) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979.tb01511.x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Modified Essay Questions: are they worth the effort?
Feletti, G. I., & Smith, E. K. (1986) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01059.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE MODIFIED ESSAY QUESTION FOR TESTING PROBLEM‐SOLVING SKILLS
Feletti, G. I., & Engel, C. E. (1980) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1980.tb134633.x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications
Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1996) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/bf00596229 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Test-enhanced learning in medical education
Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x · Cited by 610 · see citing works
- Authors
- NORMAN, G. R., SMITH, E. K. M., POWLES, A. C. P., ROONEY, P. J., HENRY, N. L., & DODD, P. E.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- NORMAN, G. R.
- ORCID
- SMITH, E. K. M.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-304
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2003132276
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- multiple-choice questions, free-response questions, question format, medical students, content validity, test score correlation, scoring methods
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Internal Medicine, Problem Solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review