Cited by 58Innovations in Medical EducationEducational Assessment and PedagogyMedical Education and Admissions

Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge

NORMAN, G. R., SMITH, E. K. M., POWLES, A. C. P., ROONEY, P.J., HENRY, N. L., DODD, P. E.·1987·Medical Education

Abstract

Summary. The study compares two popular forms of written tests; the multiple choice test (MCQ) and the Modified Essay Question (MEQ). Two factors were varied in the experiment: the format of the questions (multiple choice, directed free response, or open‐ended free response) and the context of the questions (in a patient problem or in random sequence). Six problems were developed in each version, and administered to a total of 36 medical students at three educational levels using a Latin‐square design. The results showed a significant effect of each factor in the design, amounting to a difference of 8.7% between MCQ and directed free response, 4.2% between directed and open‐ended free response and 4.3% between problem and random context. However, the correlation of scores based on content across the formats approached unity after correction for attenuation. A process score, based on the style and presentation in the undirected format, correlated more strongly with the free‐response questions. The results suggest that, although the MCQ and MEQ may assess different skills, there is a very strong relationship between content scores derived from the two formats. The free response formats may present the opportunity for assessment of other factors related to presentation if scoring procedures are modified. Finally, the effect of randomizing questions is a deterioration of performance when compared to placing questions in the problem context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00367.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of question format showed high correlation between MCQs and OEQs.

    “Studies of question format showed high correlation between MCQs and OEQs.40”

    From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NORMAN, G. R., SMITH, E. K. M., POWLES, A. C. P., ROONEY, P. J., HENRY, N. L., & DODD, P. E.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
NORMAN, G. R.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
297-304
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2003132276
Cited by
58
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
multiple-choice questions, free-response questions, question format, medical students, content validity, test score correlation, scoring methods
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Internal Medicine, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review