To call or not to call: a judgement of risk by pre‐registration house officers
Open accessAbstract
Objectives This study set out to answer the following questions. What influences a junior doctor’s response to a judgement call within a clinical setting? What, if any, are the relationships between these influences? Methods This paper describes an interpretivist study based on a grounded theory approach to data analysis. This involved a phased approach to data collection using semi‐structured interviews. Analysis was facilitated by observations and group presentations. Participants were doctors in their first year of postgraduate practice who were purposively selected from a range of hospitals in the Northern Deanery. Results The data demonstrated a number of influences on whether junior doctors chose to seek senior assistance. These included the upholding and balancing of tenets that were necessary for ensuring safe practice, and estimating the chance and severity of potential negative consequences to patients, themselves and their teams. In order to make these judgements, junior doctors drew on different forms of knowledge, especially knowledge gained from previous clinical experiences. In judging whether or not to contact a senior, pre‐registration house officers (PRHOs) were practising essential clinical attributes, that of independent yet co‐operative and discerning practitioners who are able to balance multiple considerations while ensuring patient care. Conclusions This particular judgement of risk, as it was described by those interviewed, was a dynamic process exemplified by the need to create counterbalances between multiple consequences. As a result, no prescriptive action could have allowed PRHOs to deal with the numerous configurations they faced and took into account.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any feedback that is delivered will be interpreted through the filters with which the receiver views the world of practice, the feedback provider, and his/her own abilities.
“any feedback that is delivered will be interpreted through the filters with which the receiver views the world of practice, the feedback provider, and his/her own abilities.”
From Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. (2012) · cites this paper as Stewart 2008
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029053 · Cited by 23,658 · see citing works
Education for Critical Consciousness
Freiré, P. (1973) · Bloomsbury Academic eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350190184 · Cited by 5,977 · see citing works
Informal learning in the workplace
Eraut *, M. (2004) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/158037042000225245 · Cited by 2,611 · see citing works
Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research
Britten, N. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
Douglas, M., & Wíldavsky, A. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520907393 · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice
Balser, M. D. C. (1985) · MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing · doi:10.1097/00005721-198501000-00016 · Cited by 1,359 · see citing works
Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness.
Lundberg, C. C., Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1975) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391706 · Cited by 1,285 · see citing works
Masi, A. C., & Blaikie, N. W. H. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076918 · Cited by 988 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, T., & Hurwitz, B. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7175.48 · Cited by 761 · see citing works
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Wakeford, J. (1969) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803856900300233 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Triangulation of Qualitative Methods: Heideggerian Hermeneutics and Grounded Theory
Wilson, H. S., & Hutchinson, S. A. (1991) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239100100206 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Grounded theory in nursing research: Part 1 – Methodology
McCann, T. V., & Clark, E. (2004) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2004.01.11.2.7.c5918 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Stewart, J., O’Halloran, C., Barton, J. R., et al. (2000) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00728.x · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationClark, P. G. (1997) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/37.4.441 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Problems for clinical judgement: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science.
Redelmeier, D. A., Ferris, L. E., Tu, J. V., Hux, J. E., & Schull, M. J. (2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Curriculum for the foundation years in postgraduate education and training
Wall, D. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500129696 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Risk Perception of Alcohol Consumption
Sjöberg, L. (1998) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1097/00000374-199807001-00002 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Risk Perception of Alcohol Consumption
Sjöberg, L. (1998) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb04380.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Evidence-Based Medicine: Toward a New Definition of `Rational' Medicine
Cronje, R. J., & Fullan, A. (2003) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1363459303007003006 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Melia, K. M. (2000) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2000.07.7.4.75.c6132 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A Study of the Referral Decision in General Practice
EVANS, A. (1993) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/10.2.104 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Analysing data using grounded theory
Wainwright, S. P. (1994) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.1.3.43.s6 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
‘Don't hesitate to call’– the underlying assumptions
Stewart, J. (2007) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/j.1743-498x.2007.00141.x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationAsking for senior intervention : conceptual insights into the judgement of risk by junior doctors.
Stewart, J. A. (2006) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationBehavioral Effects of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure: A Borchard Foundation Symposium
Riley, E. P. (1998) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03650.x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Downie, R. S., Macnaughton, J., & Randall, F. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192632166.003.0002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & Sargeant, J. (2012) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model.
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Eva, K., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & van der Vleuten, C. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d85a4e · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills
Kogan, J. R., Conforti, L. N., Bernabeo, E. C., Durning, S. J., Hauer, K. E., & Holmboe, E. S. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04137.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Encouraging residents to seek feedback.
Delva, D., Sargeant, J., Miller, S., Holland, J., Alexiadis Brown, P., Leblanc, C., Lightfoot, K., & Mann, K. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.806791 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stewart, J.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stewart, Jane
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-08-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 938-944
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2058347044
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- pre-registration house officers, medical residents, clinical judgment, risk assessment, clinical decision-making, clinical experience, patient safety, clinical features
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Graduate, England, Humans, Judgment, Medical Staff, Hospital, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review