Cited by 318Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model.

Open access
Sargeant, Joan, Armson, Heather, Chesluk, Ben, Dornan, Timothy, Eva, Kevin, Holmboe, Eric, Lockyer, Jocelyn, Loney, Elaine +2 more·2010·Academic Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine how learners and physicians engaged in various structured interventions to inform self-assessment, how they perceived and used self-assessment in clinical learning and practice, and the components and processes comprising informed self-assessment and factors that influence these. METHOD: This was a qualitative study guided by principles of grounded theory. Using purposive sampling, eight programs were selected in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Belgium, representing low, medium, and high degrees of structure/rigor in self-assessment activities. In 2008, 17 focus groups were conducted with 134 participants (53 undergraduate learners, 32 postgraduate learners, 49 physicians). Focus-group transcripts were analyzed interactively and iteratively by the research team to identify themes and compare and confirm findings. RESULTS: Informed self-assessment appeared as a flexible, dynamic process of accessing, interpreting, and responding to varied external and internal data. It was characterized by multiple tensions arising from complex interactions among competing internal and external data and multiple influencing conditions. The complex process was evident across the continuum of medical education and practice. A conceptual model of informed self-assessment emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Central challenges to informing self-assessment are the dynamic interrelationships and underlying tensions among the components comprising self-assessment. Realizing this increases understanding of why self-assessment accuracy seems frequently unreliable. Findings suggest the need for attention to the varied influencing conditions and inherent tensions to progress in understanding self-assessment, how it is informed, and its role in self-directed learning and professional self-regulation. Informed self-assessment is a multidimensional, complex construct requiring further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d85a4e

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Eva, K., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & van der Vleuten, C.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sargeant, Joan
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2010-07
Volume
85
Issue
7
Pages
1212-1220
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008233978
Cited by
318
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 15
FWCI
16.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
self-assessment, self-directed learning, professional self-regulation, medical education, physician self-assessment, clinical learning, conceptual model, self-assessment accuracy, learner perceptions
MeSH terms
Belgium, Canada, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Continuing, Education, Medical, Graduate, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Emotions, United Kingdom, Humans, Netherlands, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Self-Assessment, Self-Evaluation Programs, United States, Focus Groups, Models, Educational, Feedback, Psychological, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review