Cited by 40Innovations in Medical EducationProblem and Project Based LearningHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Predicting doctor performance outcomes of curriculum interventions: problem‐based learning and continuing competence

Norman, Geoffrey R, Wenghofer, Elizabeth, Klass, Daniel·2008·Medical Education

Abstract

Context Problem‐based learning (PBL) is an educational strategy designed to enhance self‐assessment, self‐directed learning and lifelong learning. The present study examines a peer review programme to determine whether the impact of PBL on continuing competence can be detected in practice. Objectives This study aimed to establish whether McMaster graduates who graduated between 1972 and 1991 were any less likely to be identified as having issues of competence by a systematic peer review programme than graduates of other Ontario medical schools. Methods We identified a total of 1166 doctors who had graduated after 1972 and had completed a mandated peer review programme. Of these, 108 had graduated from McMaster and 857 from other Canadian schools. School of graduation was cross‐tabulated against peer rating. A secondary analysis examined predictors of ratings using multiple regression. Results We found that 4% of McMaster graduates and 5% of other graduates were deemed to demonstrate cause for concern or serious concern, and that 24% of McMaster doctors and 28% of other doctors were rated as excellent. These differences were not significant. Multiple regression indicated that certification by family medicine or a specialty, female gender and younger age were all predictors of practice outcomes, but school of graduation was not. Conclusions There is no evidence from this study that PBL graduates are better able to maintain competence than graduates of conventional schools. The study highlights potential problems in attempting to link undergraduate educational interventions to doctor performance outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03131.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norman, G. R., Wenghofer, E., & Klass, D.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Laurentian University (CA)
  • College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CA)
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07-17
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
794-799
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2048998392
Cited by
40
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
problem-based learning, continuing competence, peer review, medical graduates, McMaster University, medical curriculum, specialist certification, lifelong learning
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Continuing, Ontario, Peer Group, Physicians, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review