Cited by 178Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationEthics in medical practice

Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic review

Open access
Passi, Vimmi, Doug, Manjo, Peile, Ed, Thistlethwaite, Jill, Johnson, Neil·2010·International Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

There are currently no guidelines on the most effective ways of supporting medical students to develop high standards of medical professionalism. The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence currently available on methods used by medical schools to promote medical professionalism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5116/ijme.4bda.ca2a

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unpreparedness of healthcare providers to transition to virtual interactions with patients threatens professionalism worldwide, and the need to promote professionalism in medical education has risen.

    “One of the factors that threaten professionalism worldwide is the unpreparedness of healthcare providers to transition to virtual interactions with patients [15–17], hence the need to promote professionalism in medical education has risen and is constantly being modified [18–20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 755- 757. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03134.x 18715475 · DOI
  2. tial but untapped educational strategy. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 1203- 1210. 14660418
  3. institutional study. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 578- 586. 17525545
  4. ism. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20: 819- 824. 16117749 PMC1490208
  5. medical students. Med Educ. 2006; 40: 1088- 1097. 17054618
  6. in undergraduate medical education: peer assessment enhances performance. Med Educ. 2007; 41: 836- 842. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02817.x 17696986 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passi, V., Doug, M., Peile, E., Thistlethwaite, J., & Johnson, N.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Passi, Vimmi
Venue
International Journal of Medical Education
Published
2010-05-14
Volume
1
Pages
19-29
ISSN
2042-6372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101503411
Cited by
178
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
medical professionalism, medical students, medical schools, professionalism development, professional values, medical education intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review