Cited by 66Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

What educators and students really think about using patients as teachers in medical education: a qualitative study

Open access
Jha, Vikram, Quinton, Naomi D, Bekker, Hilary L, Roberts, Trudie E·2009·Medical Education

Abstract

Objectives Patients play an integral part in medical education, either as passive, clinical exemplars or as more active facilitators in the development of skills. In theory, the patient‐teacher may enhance the student learning experience by creating an environment similar to that of the medical workplace and encouraging the process of becoming a professional. Although many medical schools have integrated patient‐teachers within their curricula, there is little evidence of how those involved in providing or receiving medical education view patient‐teachers’ contributions to their education. This study investigates the views and experiences of medical tutors and students of involving patients in undergraduate curricula. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional survey employing qualitative research methods. Semi‐structured focus group interviews were used to elicit participants’ views and experiences of patient involvement in medical education. The transcripts were content‐analysed using a coding framework. Results A total of 46 participants consisting of medical educators and medical students took part in nine focus groups. Four themes emerged: the role of the patient in learning and teaching; the impact of the patient‐teacher; the impact of being the storyteller, and mechanisms to explain the patient‐teacher role in medical training. Conclusions There is support for patient involvement in teaching. The logistics involved in supporting programmes of patient involvement and the need to link the teaching to overall course objectives should be addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03355.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Finch H, Lewis J. Focus Groups. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications 2005;170-98.
  2. Robson C. Real World Research, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing 2002;340-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jha, V., Quinton, N. D., Bekker, H. L., & Roberts, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Jha, Vikram
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-20
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
449-456
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2082070811
Cited by
66
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
patient involvement in medical education, medical students' perceptions, undergraduate medical curriculum, storytelling in teaching, professional development, experiential learning
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Undergraduate, United Kingdom, Humans, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Teaching, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review