Cited by 34HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsInnovations in Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

The role of people living with HIV as patient instructors - reducing stigma and improving interest around HIV care among medical students

Jaworsky, Denise, Gardner, Sandra, Thorne, Julie G, Sharma, Malika, McNaughton, Nancy, Paddock, Suzanne, Chew, Derek, Lees, Rick +4 more·2017·AIDS Care

Abstract

People living with HIV/AIDS (PHAs) are increasingly recognized as experts in HIV and their own health. We developed a simulated clinical encounter (SCE) in which medical students provided HIV pre- and post-test counselling and point-of-care HIV testing for PHAs as patient instructors (PHA-PIs) under clinical preceptor supervision. The study assessed the acceptability of this teaching tool with a focus on assessing impact on HIV-related stigma among medical students. University of Toronto pre-clerkship medical students participated in a series of SCEs facilitated by 16 PHA-PIs and 22 clinical preceptors. Pre- and post-SCE students completed the validated Health Care Provider HIV/AIDS Stigma Scale (HPASS). HPASS measures overall stigma, as well as three domains within HIV stigma: stereotyping, discrimination, and prejudice. Higher scores represented higher levels of stigma. An additional questionnaire measured comfort in providing HIV-related care. Mean scores and results of paired t-tests are presented. Post-SCE, students (n = 62) demonstrated decreased overall stigma (68.74 vs. 61.81, p < .001) as well as decreased stigma within each domain. Post-SCE, students (n = 67) reported increased comfort in providing HIV-related care (10.24 vs. 18.06, p < .001). Involving PHA-PIs reduced HIV-related stigma among medical students and increased comfort in providing HIV-related care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2016.1224314

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaworsky, D., Gardner, S., Thorne, J. G., Sharma, M., McNaughton, N., Paddock, S., Chew, D., Lees, R., Makuwaza, T., Wagner, A., Rachlis, A., & CHIME Research Group
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto People With AIDS Foundation (CA)
  • Nine Circles Community Health Centre (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Jaworsky, Denise
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2016-08-31
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
524-531
ISSN
  • 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0451
OpenAlex
W2511483270
Cited by
34
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute of Infection and Immunity (CBR-104070)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
people living with HIV, HIV stigma, medical students, simulated clinical encounters, point-of-care HIV testing, health professions education, stigma reduction, discrimination
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Counseling, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stereotyping, Students, Medical, HIV Infections, Patient Simulation, Point-of-Care Systems, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review