Cited by 141Innovations in Medical EducationPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

‘It’s a cultural expectation…’ The pressure on medical trainees to work independently in clinical practice

Kennedy, Tara J T, Regehr, Glenn, Baker, G Ross, Lingard, Lorelei A·2009·Medical Education

Abstract

Context Medical trainees demonstrate a reluctance to ask for help unless they believe it is absolutely necessary, a situation which could impact on the safety of patients. This study aimed to develop a theoretical exploration of the pressure on medical trainees to be independent and to generate theory‐based approaches to the implications for patient safety of this pressure towards independent working. Methods In Phase 1, 88 teaching team members from internal and emergency medicine were observed during clinical activities (216 hours), and 65 participants completed brief interviews. In Phase 2, 36 in‐depth interviews were conducted using video vignettes. Data collection and analysis employed grounded theory methodology. Results Participants conceived that the pressure towards independence in clinical work originated in trainees’ desire to lay claim to the identity of a doctor (as a member of a group of autonomous high achievers), and in organisational issues such as heavy workloads and constant evaluations. Discussion The identity and organisational issues related to the pressure towards independence were explored through the lenses of established theories from education and psychology. Consideration of Lave and Wenger’s situated learning theory suggests that giving attention to the ‘independent doctor’ ideal, through measures such as involving trainees when their supervisors ask for help, could impact the safety of teaching team practice. Amalberti et al. ’s migration model explains how pressures to maximise productivity and individual gain may cause teaching teams to migrate beyond the boundaries of safe practice and suggests that managing triggers (such as workload and high‐stakes evaluations) for violations of safe practice might improve safety. Implementation and evaluation of these theory‐based approaches to the safety of teaching team practice would contribute to a better understanding of the links between trainee independence and patient safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03382.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, T. J. T., Regehr, G., Baker, G. R., & Lingard, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Tara J T
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-22
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
645-653
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2091049030
Cited by
141
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
medical trainees, professional autonomy, patient safety, teacher teams, help-seeking, situated learning, migration models, organisational pressures, workload, clinical supervision, internal medicine, emergency medicine
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Decision Making, Education, Medical, Graduate, Emergency Medicine, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Ontario, Students, Medical, Safety Management, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review