Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies

Open access
Arora, Sonal, Ashrafian, Hutan, Davis, Rachel, Athanasiou, Thanos, Darzi, Ara, Sevdalis, Nick·2010·Medical Education

Abstract

Medical Education 2010: 44 : 749–764 Objectives Emotional intelligence (EI) involves the perception, processing, regulation and management of emotions. This article aims to systematically review the evidence for EI in medicine through the context of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English‐language articles published between January 1980 and March 2009. The grey literature was also searched and experts in the field contacted for additional studies. Two independent reviewers selected articles which reported empirical research studies about clinicians or medical students. Conceptual articles and opinion pieces and commentaries were excluded. Information about the measure used to assess EI, the study parameter or domain, and the educational or clinical outcome (with specific relation to the ACGME competencies) was extracted. Results The literature search identified 485 citations. An abstract review led to the retrieval of 24 articles for full‐text assessment, of which 16 articles were included in the final review. Eleven studies focused on postgraduates, four on undergraduates and one on medical school applicants. Six out of seven studies found women to have higher EI than men. Higher EI was reported to positively contribute to the doctor–patient relationship (three studies), increased empathy (five studies), teamwork and communication skills (six studies), and stress management, organisational commitment and leadership (three studies). Conclusions Measures of EI correlate with many of the competencies that modern medical curricula seek to deliver. Further research is required to determine whether training can improve EI and thus augment educational and clinical outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03709.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cherniss C, 2010, Emotional intelligence: towards clarification of a concept, Ind Organ Psychol
  2. Bar‐On R, 2004, The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: Common Ground and Controversy, 115
  3. Boyatzis RE, 2004, The Measurement of Emotional Intelligence: Common Ground and Controversy, 147
  4. Stroup DF, 2000, Meta‐analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting, Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA, 283, 2008
  5. 10.1001/jama.2009.81 · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.81
  6. Petrides KV, Technical manual for the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaires (TEIQue).

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Arora, S., Ashrafian, H., Davis, R., Athanasiou, T., Darzi, A., & Sevdalis, N.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
749-764
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W1862254315
Cited by
444
References
54
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03709.x
The paper
Arora, S., Ashrafian, H., Davis, R., Athanasiou, T., Darzi, A., & Sevdalis, N. (2010). Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03709.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.