The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’
Open accessAbstract
Medical Education 2012: 46: 97–106 Objectives This study aims to review, critically, the suitability of Kirkpatrick’s levels for appraising interventions in medical education, to review empirical evidence of their application in this context, and to explore alternative ways of appraising research evidence. Methods The mixed methods used in this research included a narrative literature review, a critical review of theory and qualitative empirical analysis, conducted within a process of cooperative inquiry. Results Kirkpatrick’s levels, introduced to evaluate training in industry, involve so many implicit assumptions that they are suitable for use only in relatively simple instructional designs, short‐term endpoints and beneficiaries other than learners. Such conditions are met by perhaps one‐fifth of medical education evidence reviews. Under other conditions, the hierarchical application of the levels as a critical appraisal tool adds little value and leaves reviewers to make global judgements of the trustworthiness of the data. Conclusions Far from defining a reference standard critical appraisal tool, this research shows that ‘quality’ is defined as much by the purpose to which evidence is to be put as by any invariant and objectively measurable quality. Pending further research, we offer a simple way of deciding how to appraise the quality of medical education research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1330 · Cited by 10,183
Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) · Cited by 6,637
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services
(1973) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/s0033-3506(73)80082-4 · Cited by 1,912
Pawson, R. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781849209120 · Cited by 1,791
Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., & Prideaux, D. (2006) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590600902976 · Cited by 1,417
Co-operative inquiry: research into the human condition
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-0587 · Cited by 1,199
A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9
Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701682576 · Cited by 1,163
The flawed four‐level evaluation model
Holton, E. F. (1996) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920070103 · Cited by 960
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK.
Craig, R. L., & Bittel, L. R. (1967) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 926
Cited by
Interprofessional education in allied health: a systematic review
Olson, R., & Bialocerkowski, A. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12290 · Cited by 296
Boet, S., Bould, M. D., Fung, L., Qosa, H., Perrier, L., Tavares, W., Reeves, S., & Tricco, A. C. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-014-0143-8 · Cited by 291
How and what do medical students learn in clerkships? Experience based learning (ExBL)
Dornan, T., Tan, N., Boshuizen, H., Gick, R., Isba, R., Mann, K., Scherpbier, A., Spencer, J., & Timmins, E. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9501-0 · Cited by 198
Self-citationGordon, M., Gupta, S., Thornton, D., Reid, M., Mallen, E., & Melling, A. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1652731 · Cited by 165
General practitioners as supervisors in postgraduate clinical education: an integrative review
Wearne, S., Dornan, T., Teunissen, P. W., & Skinner, T. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04348.x · Cited by 105
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yardley, S., & Dornan, T.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-13
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-106
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2110434449
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 13.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x
- The paper
- Yardley, S., & Dornan, T. (2012). Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.