The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interprofessional education in allied health: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: During the past decade, several studies have systematically reviewed interprofessional education ( IPE ), but few have inclusively reviewed this literature. None has focused primarily on IPE in allied health, despite differences in recruitment and socialisation across the health professions. This systematic review seeks to uncover the best approach to pre‐licensure, university‐based allied health IPE to determine which aspects require modification in which contexts to provide optimal learning experiences. Methods: A systematic search of 10 databases was conducted for articles published in English, between January 1998 and January 2013. Studies were included if they used quantitative or qualitative methodologies to report on the outcomes associated with IPE in allied health. Two independent reviewers identified studies that met the inclusion criteria, critically appraised the included studies and extracted data relating to the effectiveness of IPE in allied health. Data were synthesised narratively to address the study aims. Results: Large gaps – relating to methods, theory and context – remain within this body of literature. Studies measured students' attitudes and understanding of other health professional roles, teamwork and knowledge in response to IPE interventions using patient scenarios, lectures and small‐group work. Differences in power and curriculum placement were described as factors affecting IPE effectiveness. Conclusions: Evaluation remains the primary aim within this literature. Few studies use theory, take an inductive approach to understanding the processes behind IPE or include detailed participant descriptions. Therefore, we suggest that IPE research is currently caught in an epistemological struggle, between assumptions underpinning biomedical and health science research, and those underpinning education studies. As part of a systems approach to understanding interprofessional socialisation, we call for researchers to take a realistic approach to evaluation that is inclusive of, and responsive to, contextual factors to explore how IPE leads to improved long‐term outcomes in differing circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002213.pub3 · Cited by 1,946
Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice
Practice, C., & Baker, P. G. (2010) · Cited by 1,858
A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9
Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701682576 · Cited by 1,163
Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda
Thistlethwaite, J. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x · Cited by 623
Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2005) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820500083550 · Cited by 526
Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’
Yardley, S., & Dornan, T. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04076.x · Cited by 477
The effectiveness of interprofessional education: Key findings from a new systematic review
Reeves, S., Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., Barr, H., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., & Hammick, M. (2010) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820903163405 · Cited by 375
Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education
Baker, L., Egan-Lee, E., Martimianakis, M. A. (., & Reeves, S. (2011) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820.2010.505350 · Cited by 367
Effective Interprofessional Education: Development, Delivery and Evaluation
(2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470776438 · Cited by 346
Cited by
Paterson, C., Bacon, R., Dwyer, R., Morrison, K. S., Toohey, K., O'Dea, A., Slade, J., Mortazavi, R., Roberts, C., Pranavan, G., et al. (2020) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151090 · Cited by 139
Brewer, M. L., & Flavell, H. (2021) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1778652 · Cited by 9
Bartholomew, N., McKillop, A., & Barr, O. (2026) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2025.2582054 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Olson, R., & Bialocerkowski, A.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-16
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-246
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2047030182
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interprofessional education in allied health: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/medu.12290
- The paper
- Olson, R., & Bialocerkowski, A. (2014). Interprofessional education in allied health: a systematic review. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.