Cited by 274Innovations in Medical EducationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests?

Sobral, Dejano T·2004·Medical Education

Abstract

Aims To describe the patterns of medical students' motivation early in the undergraduate programme and to examine their relationships with learning features and motivational outcomes. Methods The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) was administered after the first medical year to 297 students of both sexes from consecutive classes within a 4‐year timeframe. Measures of learner orientation and reflection in learning were also obtained. Academic achievement and peer tutoring experience were recorded during a 2‐year follow‐up. Quantitative approaches included analysis of variance, correlational and classificatory analyses of the data. Results The profile of the students' responses revealed higher levels of autonomous motivation than of controlled motivation although such measures were positively related. Correlation analysis showed significant association of autonomous motivation with higher levels of meaning orientation, reflection in learning, academic achievement, cross‐year peer‐tutoring experience, and intention to continue with studies. Classificatory analysis identified 4 student groups with distinct patterns of motivation. Analysis of variance revealed significant and consistent differences in learning features and outcomes among such groups. Conclusions The findings indicate that medical students portray distinct patterns of autonomous and controlled motivation that seem to relate to the learners' frame of mind towards learning as well as the educational environment. Autonomous motivation had closer relationships than controlled motivation with measures of self‐regulation of learning and academic success in the context of a demanding medical programme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01913.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sobral, D. T.
Affiliations
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Corresponding author
Sobral, Dejano T
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-24
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
950-957
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2166387216
Cited by
274
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, medical students, academic motivation, Academic Motivation Scale, meaning orientations, reflection in learning, academic performance, peer tutoring, student self-regulation, learner orientation, undergraduate medical education
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Motivation, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review