Cited by 88Innovations in Medical EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Relationship between metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn in medical students

Open access
Siqueira, Marina Alves Martins, Gonçalves, Johnatan Padovez, Mendonça, Vitor Silva, Kobayasi, Renata, Arantes-Costa, Fernanda Magalhães, Tempski, Patricia Zen, Martins, Mílton de Arruda·2020·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

Background: In self-regulated learning, learning is defined as metacognitively guided, intrinsically motivated and strategic. In the context of medical education, the development of self-regulated learning can be associated with better academic and clinical performance. Hence, this report focuses on demonstrating the association between metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn among medical students in the clinical sciences portion of their education (3rd and 4th years of the medical programme) and characterizing medical students’ motivational factors. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study with a qualitative and quantitative approach involving medical students from the University of Sao Paulo (USP) in Brazil. We have selected validated self-report questionnaires for the evaluation of metacognition (the Schraw and Dennison Metacognitive Awareness Inventory - MAI) and motivation to learn (the Baranik, Barron and Finney Achievement Goals for a Work Domain - AGWD). MAI has two domains: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition. AGWD divides achievement goals into mastery approach, mastery avoidance, performance approach and performance avoidance goal orientations. We also performed a qualitative analysis based on an open-ended question: “What motivates me the most in medical training?” Results: One hundred eighty-five students completed the questionnaires: 103 (55.67%) were men, 110 (59.45%) were in their fourth year of the medical programme, and 152 (82.16%) were up to 24 years old. Only the knowledge about cognition domain of MAI was significantly associated with motivation to learn. We found that higher scores on the knowledge about cognition domain of MAI was associated with the mastery approach goal orientation (p = 0.003, median 0.71, IQR 0.23) and that lower scores on this same domain was associated with a mastery avoidance goal orientation (p = 0.034, median 0.65, IQR 0.14). The open-ended question showed that altruism, personal satisfaction, financial feedback, personal and supportive networks and graduating were motivational factors. Conclusions: Metacognitive awareness and motivation to learn are closely related. This association may represent a potential target for the educational process, as deans and faculty can adopt strategies focused on promoting self-regulated learning concerning students’ motivational factors. This could enhance academic outcomes and promote more enjoyable learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-020-02318-8

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Undergraduate medical students with greater metacognitive awareness are more motivated to learn independently, leading to autonomous self-regulated learning.

    “as well as more motivated to learn independently, leading to autonomous self- regulated learning (Siqueira et al.,2020 ).”

    From Promoting metacognition in an allied health anatomy course (2023) · cites this paper as Siqueira et al., 2020

    The Results (page unavailable) associate one component of metacognitive awareness—knowledge about cognition—with mastery-approach motivation in medical students. The Background and Discussion link metacognition and motivation to self-regulated learning, but the study does not show that greater awareness makes students more motivated to learn independently or leads to autonomous self-regulated learning. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The improvement in metacognition is consistent with previous studies, but the literature remains inconclusive on the stage at which students typically improve their metacognition during health professional education.

    “This improvement in metacognition is consistent with previous studies, but generally, the literature remains inconclusive on the stage at which students typically improve their metacognition during health professional education (Siqueira et al.,2020).”

    From Promoting metacognition in an allied health anatomy course (2023) · cites this paper as Siqueira et al.,2020

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says prior evidence associates metacognitive development with active learning, mentoring and feedback, supporting the general point that metacognition can improve. It does not say the literature is inconclusive about when students typically improve during health professional education. The Results (page unavailable) compare only third- and fourth-year medical students and find no significant difference in metacognitive awareness. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]I ANC. Based Learning (PBL) em Quatro Periódicos Selecionados Analysis of Bibliographic Production on Problem- Based Learning (PBL) in Four Selected Journals. 2018;42:13–24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siqueira, M. A. M., Gonçalves, J. P., Mendonça, V. S., Kobayasi, R., Arantes-Costa, F. M., Tempski, P. Z., & Martins, M. D. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2020-10-30
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
393-393
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097462880
Cited by
88
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
metacognitive awareness, motivation to learn, student self-regulation, medical students, achievement goals, mastery approach, mastery avoidance, performance approach, performance avoidance, metacognitive regulation, motivational factors, altruism
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review