The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study
Abstract
Introduction The practice of dissection, as part of undergraduate medical education, has recently resurfaced in the public eye. This paper focuses on a number of important learning outcomes that were reported by Year 1–5 medical students in a British medical school, during the dissection sessions in the first 2 years of their training, as part of a wider qualitative research project into undergraduate medical education. Methods A group of 29 students was selected by quota sampling, using the whole student population of the medical school as the sampling frame. Qualitative data were collected by 1 : 1 interviews with students and from formal non‐participatory observations of dissection sessions. Results Apart from learning to cope with the overt ‘emotional confrontation’ with the cadavers which assists anatomical learning, 7 additional covert learning outcomes were identified by the students: teamwork, respect for the body, familiarisation of the body, application of practical skills, integration of theory and practice, preparation for clinical work, and appreciation of the status of dissection within the history of medicine. Discussion A number of medical schools have either removed the practical, hands‐on aspect of dissection in the medical undergraduate curriculum or are seriously considering such a measure, on financial and/or human resource grounds. This study highlights the fact that dissection can impart anatomical knowledge as well as offer other relevant, positive learning opportunities to enhance the skills and attitudes of future doctors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization
Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., & Khurana, A. (2010) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.139 · Cited by 991
Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future
McLachlan, J. C., & Patten, D. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02401.x · Cited by 462
Nursing students' experiences and perceptions of an anatomy laboratory session: Mixed methods study
Asman, O., Kagan, I., & Itzhaki, M. (2022) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2106 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Lempp, H. K.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 318-325
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2089796858
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02095.x
- The paper
- Lempp, H. K. (2005). Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02095.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.