Cited by 131Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationEthics in medical practice

You're judged all the time: students' views on professionalism: a multicentre study

Open access
Finn, Gabrielle, Garner, Jayne, Sawdon, Marina·2010·Medical Education

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study describes how medical students perceive professionalism and the context in which it is relevant to them. An understanding of how Phase 1 students perceive professionalism will help us to teach this subject more effectively. Phase 1 medical students are those in the first 2 years of a 5-year medical degree. METHODS: Seventy-two undergraduate students from two UK medical schools participated in 13 semi-structured focus groups. Focus groups, carried out until thematic saturation occurred, were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed and coded using NVivo 8, using a grounded theory approach with constant comparison. RESULTS: From the analysis, seven themes regarding professionalism emerged: the context of professionalism; role-modelling; scrutiny of behaviour; professional identity; 'switching on' professionalism; leniency (for students with regard to professional standards), and sacrifice (of freedom as an individual). Students regarded professionalism as being relevant in three contexts: the clinical, the university and the virtual. Students called for leniency during their undergraduate course, opposing the guidance from Good Medical Practice. Unique findings were the impact of clothing and the online social networking site Facebook on professional behaviour and identity. Changing clothing was described as a mechanism by which students 'switch on' their professional identity. Students perceived society to be struggling with the distinction between doctors as individuals and professionals. This extended to the students' online identities on Facebook. Institutions' expectations of high standards of professionalism were associated with a feeling of sacrifice by students caused by the perception of constantly 'being watched'; this perception was coupled with resentment of this intrusion. Students described the significant impact that role-modelling had on their professional attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: This research offers valuable insight into how Phase 1 medical students construct their personal and professional identities in both the offline and online environments. Acknowledging these learning mechanisms will enhance the development of a genuinely student-focused professionalism curriculum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03743.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Important differences exist in perceptions of inappropriate social media behavior among various stakeholders.

    “Further, important differences exist in perceptions of inappropriate SM behavior among various stakeholders.”
  • Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online 'social identity' rather than potential unprofessional behavior.

    “Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online '' social identity '' rather than potential unprofessional behavior. 13,14”
  • Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online social identity rather than potential unprofessional behavior.

    “Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online ‘‘social identity’’ rather than potential unprofessional behavior [154,155].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finn, G., Garner, J., & Sawdon, M.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Finn, Gabrielle
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
814-825
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2155114831
Cited by
131
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
professionalism, medical students, professional identity, role modeling, good medical practice, Facebook, online social networking, clothing, professional standards, professionalism curriculum, undergraduate medical education, student perceptions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Professional Competence, Professional Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review