Cited by 34Reflective Practices in EducationInnovations in Medical EducationEducational Leadership and Innovation

Crafting the reflective lifelong learner: why, what and how

Albanese, Mark A·2006·Medical Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02470.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albanese, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Albanese, Mark A
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-28
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
288-290
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2071399878
Cited by
34
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
Keywords
reflective practice, lifelong learning, reflective learning, professional development
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Learning, Motivation, Role, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review