The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore
Open accessAbstract
Genetic diversity and population structure were investigated across the core range of Tasmanian devils (Sarcophilus laniarius; Dasyuridae), a wide‐ranging marsupial carnivore restricted to the island of Tasmania. Heterozygosity (0.386–0.467) and allelic diversity (2.7–3.3) were low in all subpopulations and allelic size ranges were small and almost continuous, consistent with a founder effect. Island effects and repeated periods of low population density may also have contributed to the low variation. Within continuous habitat, gene flow appears extensive up to 50 km (high assignment rates to source or close neighbour populations; nonsignificant values of pairwise FST), in agreement with movement data. At larger scales (150–250 km), gene flow is reduced (significant pairwise FST) but there is no evidence for isolation by distance. The most substantial genetic structuring was observed for comparisons spanning unsuitable habitat, implying limited dispersal of devils between the well‐connected, eastern populations and a smaller northwestern population. The genetic distinctiveness of the northwestern population was reflected in all analyses: unique alleles; multivariate analyses of gene frequency (multidimensional scaling, minimum spanning tree, nearest neighbour); high self‐assignment (95%); two distinct populations for Tasmania were detected in isolation by distance and in Bayesian model‐based clustering analyses. Marsupial carnivores appear to have stronger population subdivisions than their placental counterparts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Cited by
Clonal Origin and Evolution of a Transmissible Cancer
Murgia, C., Pritchard, J. K., Kim, S. Y., Fassati, A., & Weiss, R. A. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.051 · Cited by 485
Transmission of devil facial-tumour disease
Pearse, A.-M., & Swift, K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/439549a · Cited by 414
Life-history change in disease-ravaged Tasmanian devil populations
Jones, M. E., Cockburn, A., Hamede, R., Hawkins, C., Hesterman, H., Lachish, S., Mann, D., McCallum, H., & Pemberton, D. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0711236105 · Cited by 295
Self-citationConservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Morris, K., Austin, J. J., & Belov, K. (2013) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0900 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- JONES, M. E., PAETKAU, D., GEFFEN, E., & MORITZ, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2197-2209
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2161166286
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02239.x
- The paper
- JONES, M. E., PAETKAU, D., GEFFEN, E., & MORITZ, C. (2004). Genetic diversity and population structure of Tasmanian devils, the largest marsupial carnivore. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02239.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.