The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?
Abstract
Although most genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size (Ne) are based on models that assume Neis constant, in real populations Nechanges (often dramatically) over time, and estimates (N̂e) will be influenced by Nein specific generations. In such cases, it is important to properly match N̂eto the appropriate time periods (for example, in computing Ne/N ratios). Here I consider this problem for semelparous species with two life histories (discrete generations and variable age at maturity — the ‘salmon’ model), for two different sampling plans, and for estimators based on single samples (linkage disequilibrium, heterozygote excess) and two samples (temporal method). Results include the following.Discrete generations: (i) Temporal samples from generations 0 and t estimate the harmonic mean Nein generations 0 through t − 1 but do not provide information about Nein generation t; (ii) Single samples provide an estimate of Nein the parental generation, not the generation sampled; (iii) single‐sample and temporal estimates never provide information about Nein exactly the same generations; (iv) Recent bottlenecks can downwardly bias estimates based on linkage disequilibrium for several generations.Salmon model: (i) A pair of single‐cohort (typically juvenile) samples from years 0 and t provide a temporal estimate of the harmonic mean of the effective numbers of breeders in the two parental years (Nb(0)and Nb(t)), but adult samples are more difficult to interpret because they are influenced by Nbin a number of previous years; (ii) For single‐cohort samples, both one‐sample and temporal methods provide estimates of Nbin the same years (contrast with results for discrete generation model); (iii) Residual linkage disequilibrium associated with past population size will not affect single‐sample estimates of Nbas much as in the discrete generation model because the disequilibrium diffuses among different years of breeders. These results lead to some general conclusions about genetic estimates of Nein iteroparous species with overlapping generations and identify areas in need of further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS
Wright, S. (1931) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 · Cited by 8,916
Beerli, P., & Felsenstein, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.081068098 · Cited by 1,711
Mathematical Population Genetics
Baake, E., Ewens, W. J., & Wakolbinger, A. (2006) · Oberwolfach Reports · doi:10.4171/owr/2005/40 · Cited by 1,624
Automated binning of microsatellite alleles: problems and solutions
AMOS, W., HOFFMAN, J. I., FRODSHAM, A., ZHANG, L., BEST, S., & HILL, A. V. S. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01560.x · Cited by 1,481
Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review
Frankham, R. (1995) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300034455 · Cited by 1,370
Mathematical Population Genetics
Ewens, W. J. (2004) · Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21822-9 · Cited by 1,229
Efective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review
FRANKHAM, R. (2007) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672308009695 · Cited by 1,112
Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium
Hill, W. G. (1981) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300020553 · Cited by 865
Waples, R. S. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/121.2.379 · Cited by 811
Self-citationMathematical Population Genetics.
Weir, B. S., & Ewens, W. J. (1980) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2556131 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Do, C., Waples, R. S., Peel, D., Macbeth, G. M., Tillett, B. J., & Ovenden, J. R. (2014) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12157 · Cited by 2,101
Self-citationWaples, R. S., & Do, C. (2010) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00104.x · Cited by 991
Self-citationLuikart, G., Ryman, N., Tallmon, D. A., Schwartz, M. K., & Allendorf, F. W. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0050-7 · Cited by 656
Prediction and estimation of effective population size
Wang, J., Santiago, E., & Caballero, A. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2016.43 · Cited by 401
Waples, R. S., & England, P. R. (2011) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132233 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- WAPLES, R. S.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3335-3352
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2004819786
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02673.x
- The paper
- WAPLES, R. S. (2005). Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02673.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.