Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?

WAPLES, ROBIN S.·2005·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Although most genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size (Ne) are based on models that assume Neis constant, in real populations Nechanges (often dramatically) over time, and estimates (N̂e) will be influenced by Nein specific generations. In such cases, it is important to properly match N̂eto the appropriate time periods (for example, in computing Ne/N ratios). Here I consider this problem for semelparous species with two life histories (discrete generations and variable age at maturity — the ‘salmon’ model), for two different sampling plans, and for estimators based on single samples (linkage disequilibrium, heterozygote excess) and two samples (temporal method). Results include the following.Discrete generations: (i) Temporal samples from generations 0 and t estimate the harmonic mean Nein generations 0 through t − 1 but do not provide information about Nein generation t; (ii) Single samples provide an estimate of Nein the parental generation, not the generation sampled; (iii) single‐sample and temporal estimates never provide information about Nein exactly the same generations; (iv) Recent bottlenecks can downwardly bias estimates based on linkage disequilibrium for several generations.Salmon model: (i) A pair of single‐cohort (typically juvenile) samples from years 0 and t provide a temporal estimate of the harmonic mean of the effective numbers of breeders in the two parental years (Nb(0)and Nb(t)), but adult samples are more difficult to interpret because they are influenced by Nbin a number of previous years; (ii) For single‐cohort samples, both one‐sample and temporal methods provide estimates of Nbin the same years (contrast with results for discrete generation model); (iii) Residual linkage disequilibrium associated with past population size will not affect single‐sample estimates of Nbas much as in the discrete generation model because the disequilibrium diffuses among different years of breeders. These results lead to some general conclusions about genetic estimates of Nein iteroparous species with overlapping generations and identify areas in need of further research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02673.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
WAPLES, R. S.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-03
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
3335-3352
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2004819786
Cited by
379
References
40
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02673.x
The paper
WAPLES, R. S. (2005). Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply? Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02673.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.