Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,624

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mathematical Population Genetics

Baake, Ellen, Ewens, Warren J., Wakolbinger, Anton·2006·Oberwolfach Reports

Abstract

One of the aims of population genetics is to explain how the genetic variation within and between biological populations is generated and maintained. Population genetics theory describes the change in the genetic composition of populations under the influence of various evolutionary processes such as genetic drift, mutation, selection, recombination, and migration. Elements of randomness turn out to be essential in the modelling of these processes. Random genetic drift, for example, is a consequence of the fact that, even without fitness differences, some individuals may, by chance, have more offspring than others, so that the offspring of one genotype may displace another. The basic processes of evolution are known in principle, along with fundamental equations which describe the effects of interactions between genes. Indeed, of the biological sciences, genetics – and population genetics in particular – is the one with the most clearly defined mathematical models, with a strong emphasis on probability. This fact has increasingly attracted probabilists who have given the theory a new impetus through powerful modern methods. Thus there is now an increasingly large community of biologists and mathematicians speaking a common language, learning from each other, and identifying problems that should be attacked. This spirit was manifest in our meeting, with its small group of senior mathematicians and biologists, and its larger fraction of young researchers. The topics presented during the workshop crystallized into the following thematic groups: Genetic hitchhiking and selective sweeps (Stephan, Schweinsberg, Etheridge); Mutation-selection systems (Evans, Stannat); Speciation and adaptation (Bürger, Champagnat); Spatially structured systems (Birkner, Swart, Hutzenthaler); Stochastic processes associated with the coalescent (Krone, Pfaffelhuber); Poisson–Dirichlet distributions (Spano, Feng); Sampling formulae and coalescent-based inference (Ewens, Griffiths, Wakeley, Möhle, Hudson); Recombination, gene-rearrangement and sequence alignment (M. Baake, Beresticky, Metzler) Stimulated by these lectures, there were many discussions and a rich scientific exchange during the workshop, between generations as well as between disciplines. Last not least, the meeting also profited greatly from the friendly and serene Oberwolfach atmosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4171/owr/2005/40

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,624

Metadata

Authors
Baake, E., Ewens, W. J., & Wakolbinger, A.
Venue
Oberwolfach Reports
Published
2006-06-30
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
2241-2304
ISSN
  • 1660-8933 (ISSN-L)
  • 1660-8941
OpenAlex
W2024997496
Cited by
1,624
References
0
FWCI
119.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematical Population Genetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4171/owr/2005/40
The paper
Baake, E., Ewens, W. J., & Wakolbinger, A. (2006). Mathematical Population Genetics. Oberwolfach Reports. https://doi.org/10.4171/owr/2005/40

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.