Cited by 714Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing

VERA, J. CRISTOBAL, WHEAT, CHRISTOPHER W., FESCEMYER, HOWARD W., FRILANDER, MIKKO J., CRAWFORD, DOUGLAS L., HANSKI, ILKKA, MARDEN, JAMES H.·2008·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

We present a de novo assembly of a eukaryote transcriptome using 454 pyrosequencing data. The Glanville fritillary butterfly ( Melitaea cinxia ; Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) is a prominent species in population biology but had no previous genomic data. Sequencing runs using two normalized complementary DNA collections from a genetically diverse pool of larvae, pupae, and adults yielded 608 053 expressed sequence tags (mean length = 110 nucleotides), which assembled into 48 354 contigs (sets of overlapping DNA segments) and 59 943 singletons. blast comparisons confirmed the accuracy of the sequencing and assembly, and indicated the presence of c . 9000 unique genes, along with > 6000 additional microarray‐confirmed unannotated contigs. Average depth of coverage was 6.5‐fold for the longest 4800 contigs (348–2849 bp in length), sufficient for detecting large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Oligonucleotide microarray probes designed from the assembled sequences showed highly repeatable hybridization intensity and revealed biological differences among individuals. We conclude that 454 sequencing, when performed to provide sufficient coverage depth, allows de novo transcriptome assembly and a fast, cost‐effective, and reliable method for development of functional genomic tools for nonmodel species. This development narrows the gap between approaches based on model organisms with rich genetic resources vs. species that are most tractable for ecological and evolutionary studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03666.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VERA, J. C., WHEAT, C. W., FESCEMYER, H. W., FRILANDER, M. J., CRAWFORD, D. L., HANSKI, I., & MARDEN, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
VERA, J. CRISTOBAL
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-25
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
1636-1647
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W1985484001
Cited by
714
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 101
FWCI
38.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
Melitaea cinxia, transcriptome assembly, de novo assembly, 454 pyrosequencing, non-model organisms, expressed sequence tags, oligonucleotide microarrays, single nucleotide polymorphisms, functional genomics
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Butterflies, Sequence Alignment, Alternative Splicing, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Complementary, Expressed Sequence Tags, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review