The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time-dependent rates of molecular evolution
Abstract
For over half a century, it has been known that the rate of morphological evolution appears to vary with the time frame of measurement. Rates of microevolutionary change, measured between successive generations, were found to be far higher than rates of macroevolutionary change inferred from the fossil record. More recently, it has been suggested that rates of molecular evolution are also time dependent, with the estimated rate depending on the timescale of measurement. This followed surprising observations that estimates of mutation rates, obtained in studies of pedigrees and laboratory mutation-accumulation lines, exceeded long-term substitution rates by an order of magnitude or more. Although a range of studies have provided evidence for such a pattern, the hypothesis remains relatively contentious. Furthermore, there is ongoing discussion about the factors that can cause molecular rate estimates to be dependent on time. Here we present an overview of our current understanding of time-dependent rates. We provide a summary of the evidence for time-dependent rates in animals, bacteria and viruses. We review the various biological and methodological factors that can cause rates to be time dependent, including the effects of natural selection, calibration errors, model misspecification and other artefacts. We also describe the challenges in calibrating estimates of molecular rates, particularly on the intermediate timescales that are critical for an accurate characterization of time-dependent rates. This has important consequences for the use of molecular-clock methods to estimate timescales of recent evolutionary events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463 · cited 3×
“2009), it is typically assumed that all of the branch-specific rates come from a single distribution (Drummond et al. 2006).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationInstability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data
Heled, J., & Drummond, A. J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274 · Cited by 2,453
Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution
OHTA, T. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/246096a0 · Cited by 1,104
Initial Genetic Characterization of the 1918 “Spanish” Influenza Virus
Taubenberger, J. K., Reid, A. H., Krafft, A. E., Bijwaard, K. E., & Fanning, T. G. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5307.1793 · Cited by 715
Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks.
Yoder, A. D., & Yang, Z. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026389 · Cited by 494
Bayesian random local clocks, or one rate to rule them all
Drummond, A. J., & Suchard, M. A. (2010) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-114 · Cited by 429
Rambaut, A. (2000) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.395 · Cited by 418
Model Selection in Phylogenetics
Sullivan, J., & Joyce, P. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152633 · Cited by 412
The importance of proper model assumption in bayesian phylogenetics.
Lemmon, A. R., & Moriarty, E. C. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490423520 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Endogenous viruses: insights into viral evolution and impact on host biology
Feschotte, C., & Gilbert, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3199 · Cited by 891
Rabosky, D. L., Santini, F., Eastman, J., Smith, S. A., Sidlauskas, B., Chang, J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2958 · Cited by 685
Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies
Tamura, K., Battistuzzi, F. U., Billing-Ross, P., Murillo, O., Filipski, A., & Kumar, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1213199109 · Cited by 676
Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution
Scally, A., & Durbin, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3295 · Cited by 610
Chow, N. A., Muñoz, J. F., Gade, L., Berkow, E., Li, X., Welsh, R. M., Forsberg, K., Lockhart, S. R., Adam, R., Alanio, A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.01.06.896548 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- HO, S. Y. W., LANFEAR, R., BROMHAM, L., PHILLIPS, M. J., SOUBRIER, J., RODRIGO, A. G., & COOPER, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3087-3101
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1544686358
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 26.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time-dependent rates of molecular evolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05178.x
- The paper
- HO, S. Y. W., LANFEAR, R., BROMHAM, L., PHILLIPS, M. J., SOUBRIER, J., RODRIGO, A. G., & COOPER, A. (2011). Time-dependent rates of molecular evolution. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05178.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.