The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The genetic differentiation at quantitative trait loci under local adaptation
Open accessAbstract
Most adaptive traits are controlled by large number of genes that may all together be the targets of selection. Adaptation may thus involve multiple but not necessarily substantial allele frequency changes. This has important consequences for the detection of selected loci and implies that a quantitative genetics framework may be more appropriate than the classical ‘selective sweep’ paradigm. Preferred methods to detect loci involved in local adaptation are based on the detection of ‘outlier’ values of the allelic differentiation FST. A quantitative genetics framework is adopted here to review theoretical expectations for how allelic differentiation at quantitative trait loci (FSTQ) relates to (i), neutral genetic differentiation (FST) and (ii), phenotypic differentiation (QST). We identify cases where results of outlier‐based methods are likely to be poor and where differentiation at selected loci conveys little information regarding local adaptation. A first case is when neutral differentiation is high, so that local adaptation does not necessitate increased differentiation. A second case is when local adaptation is reached via an increased covariance of allelic effects rather than via allele frequency changes, which is more likely under high gene flow when the number of loci is high and selection is recent. The comparison of theoretical predictions with observed data from the literature suggests that polygenic local adaptation involving only faint allele frequency changes are very likely in some species such as forest trees and for climate‐related traits. Recent methodological improvements that may alleviate the weakness of FST‐based detection methods are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
ROGERS, S. M., & BERNATCHEZ, L. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02396.x · Cited by 5,088
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.
Fisher, R. A. (1919) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh · doi:10.1017/s0080456800012163 · Cited by 4,387
Foll, M., & Gaggiotti, O. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.092221 · Cited by 2,736
A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE
Hedrick, P. W. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01814.x · Cited by 1,909
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond
ECKERT, C. G., SAMIS, K. E., & LOUGHEED, S. C. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03659.x · Cited by 1,671
Byrd, W. P. (1961) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1961.00021962005300010026x · Cited by 1,572
The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time
Buckler, E. S., Holland, J. B., Bradbury, P. J., Acharya, C. B., Brown, P. J., Browne, C., Ersoz, E., Flint-Garcia, S., Garcia, A., Glaubitz, J. C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174276 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence
Merilä, J., & Hendry, A. P. (2014) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12137 · Cited by 1,369
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
Lotterhos, K. E., & Whitlock, M. C. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12725 · Cited by 526
A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation
Berg, J. J., & Coop, G. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 · Cited by 487
Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation
Wolf, J. B. W., & Ellegren, H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.133 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- LE CORRE, V., & KREMER, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-14
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1548-1566
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1870614750
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The genetic differentiation at quantitative trait loci under local adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05479.x
- The paper
- LE CORRE, V., & KREMER, A. (2012). The genetic differentiation at quantitative trait loci under local adaptation. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05479.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.