The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome divergence during evolutionary diversification as revealed in replicate lake–stream stickleback population pairs
Abstract
Evolutionary diversification is often initiated by adaptive divergence between populations occupying ecologically distinct environments while still exchanging genes. The genetic foundations of this divergence process are largely unknown and are here explored through genome scans in multiple independent lake–stream population pairs of threespine stickleback. We find that across the pairs, overall genomic divergence is associated with the magnitude of divergence in phenotypes known to be under divergent selection. Along this same axis of increasing diversification, genomic divergence becomes increasingly biased towards the centre of chromosomes as opposed to the peripheries. We explain this pattern by within‐chromosome variation in the physical extent of hitchhiking, as recombination is greatly reduced in chromosome centres. Correcting for this effect suggests that a great number of genes distributed widely across the genome are involved in the divergence into lake vs. stream habitats. Analyzing additional allopatric population pairs, however, reveals that strong divergence in some genomic regions has been driven by selection unrelated to lake–stream ecology. Our study highlights a major contribution of large‐scale variation in recombination rate to generating heterogeneous genomic divergence and indicates that elucidating the genetic basis of adaptive divergence might be more challenging than currently recognized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles.
Colosimo, P. F., Hosemann, K. E., Balabhadra, S., Villarreal, G., Dickson, M., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., Myers, R. M., Schluter, D., & Kingsley, D. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1107239 · Cited by 1,448
Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation
Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047985 · Cited by 1,178
Cited by
Genomics and the origin of species
Seehausen, O., Butlin, R. K., Keller, I., Wagner, C. E., Boughman, J. W., Hohenlohe, P. A., Peichel, C. L., Saetre, G.-P., Bank, C., Brännström, Å., et al. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3644 · Cited by 1,016
The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow
Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P., & Nosil, P. (2012) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.009 · Cited by 832
Hybridization, Introgression, and the Nature of Species Boundaries
(2014) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esu033 · Cited by 745
Tine, M., Kuhl, H., Gagnaire, P.-A., Louro, B., Desmarais, E., Martins, R. S. T., Hecht, J., Knaust, F., Belkhir, K., Klages, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6770 · Cited by 451
Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation
Wolf, J. B. W., & Ellegren, H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.133 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- ROESTI, M., HENDRY, A. P., SALZBURGER, W., & BERNER, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2852-2862
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1830332211
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome divergence during evolutionary diversification as revealed in replicate lake–stream stickleback population pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05509.x
- The paper
- ROESTI, M., HENDRY, A. P., SALZBURGER, W., & BERNER, D. (2012). Genome divergence during evolutionary diversification as revealed in replicate lake–stream stickleback population pairs. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05509.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.