The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome‐wide association genetics of an adaptive trait in lodgepole pine
Abstract
Pine cones that remain closed and retain seeds until fire causes the cones to open (cone serotiny) represent a key adaptive trait in a variety of pine species. In lodgepole pine, there is substantial geographical variation in serotiny across the Rocky Mountain region. This variation in serotiny has evolved as a result of geographically divergent selection, with consequences that extend to forest communities and ecosystems. An understanding of the genetic architecture of this trait is of interest owing to the wide‐reaching ecological consequences of serotiny and also because of the repeated evolution of the trait across the genus. Here, we present and utilize an inexpensive and time‐effective method for generating population genomic data. The method uses restriction enzymes and PCR amplification to generate a library of fragments that can be sequenced with a high level of multiplexing. We obtained data for more than 95 000 single nucleotide polymorphisms across 98 serotinous and nonserotinous lodgepole pines from three populations. We used a Bayesian generalized linear model (GLM) to test for an association between genotypic variation at these loci and serotiny. The probability of serotiny varied by genotype at 11 loci, and the association between genotype and serotiny at these loci was consistent in each of the three populations of pines. Genetic variation across these 11 loci explained 50% of the phenotypic variation in serotiny. Our results provide a first genome‐wide association map of serotiny in pines and demonstrate an inexpensive and efficient method for generating population genomic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study
EVANNO, G., REGNAUT, S., & GOUDET, J. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x · Cited by 21,895
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. V. D., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., et al. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · Cited by 12,401
Falush, D., Stephens, M., & Pritchard, J. K. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567 · Cited by 7,959
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,501
Yu, J., Pressoir, G., Briggs, W. H., Vroh Bi, I., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J. F., McMullen, M. D., Gaut, B. S., Nielsen, D. M., Holland, J. B., et al. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1702 · Cited by 4,133
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits
Hirschhorn, J. N., & Daly, M. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1521 · Cited by 2,863
Illumina Sequencing Library Preparation for Highly Multiplexed Target Capture and Sequencing
Meyer, M., & Kircher, M. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Protocols · doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · Cited by 2,231
Worldwide Human Relationships Inferred from Genome-Wide Patterns of Variation
Li, J. Z., Absher, D. M., Tang, H., Southwick, A. M., Casto, A. M., Ramachandran, S., Cann, H. M., Barsh, G. S., Feldman, M., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153717 · Cited by 1,941
Cited by
Evolutionary fire ecology: lessons learned from pines
Pausas, J. G. (2015) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.001 · Cited by 187
New approaches for genome assembly and scaffolding
Rice, E. S., & Green, R. E. (2019) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115344 · Cited by 110
Genetic structure in Louisiana Iris species reveals patterns of recent and historical admixture
Zalmat, A. S., Sotola, V. A., Nice, C. C., & Martin, N. H. (2021) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/ajb2.1758 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- PARCHMAN, T. L., GOMPERT, Z., MUDGE, J., SCHILKEY, F. D., BENKMAN, C. W., & BUERKLE, C. A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2991-3005
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1581676772
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome‐wide association genetics of an adaptive trait in lodgepole pine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05513.x
- The paper
- PARCHMAN, T. L., GOMPERT, Z., MUDGE, J., SCHILKEY, F. D., BENKMAN, C. W., & BUERKLE, C. A. (2012). Genome‐wide association genetics of an adaptive trait in lodgepole pine. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05513.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.