The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
C‐di‐GMP: the dawning of a novel bacterial signalling system
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Bis‐(3′‐5′)‐cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c‐di‐GMP) has come to the limelight as a result of the recent advances in microbial genomics and increased interest in multicellular microbial behaviour. Known for more than 15 years as an activator of cellulose synthase in Gluconacetobacter xylinus, c‐di‐GMP is emerging as a novel global second messenger in bacteria. The GGDEF and EAL domain proteins involved in c‐di‐GMP synthesis and degradation, respectively, are (almost) ubiquitous in bacterial genomes. These proteins affect cell differentiation and multicellular behaviour as well as interactions between the microorganisms and their eukaryotic hosts and other phenotypes. While the role of GGDEF and EAL domain proteins in bacterial physiology and behaviour has gained appreciation, and significant progress has been achieved in understanding the enzymology of c‐di‐GMP turnover, many questions regarding c‐di‐GMP‐dependent signalling remain unanswered. Among these, the key questions are the identity of targets of c‐di‐GMP action and mechanisms of c‐di‐GMP‐dependent regulation. This review discusses phylogenetic distribution of the c‐di‐GMP signalling pathway in bacteria, recent developments in biochemical and structural characterization of proteins involved in its metabolism, and biological processes affected by c‐di‐GMP. The accumulated data clearly indicate that a novel ubiquitous signalling system in bacteria has been discovered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation
Drenkard, E., & Ausubel, F. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416740a · Cited by 997
Cited by
The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review
Monds, R. D., & O’Toole, G. A. (2009) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.11.001 · Cited by 532
Barraud, N., Storey, M. V., Moore, Z. P., Webb, J. S., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2009) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00098.x · Cited by 289
Nitric oxide regulation of bacterial biofilms
Arora, D. P., Hossain, S., Xu, Y., & Boon, E. M. (2015) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi501476n · Cited by 206
Sambanthamoorthy, K., Sloup, R. E., Parashar, V., Smith, J. M., Kim, E. E., Semmelhack, M. F., Neiditch, M. B., & Waters, C. M. (2012) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01396-12 · Cited by 151
Kim, B., Park, J.-S., Choi, H.-Y., Yoon, S. S., & Kim, W.-G. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26974-5 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Römling, U., Gomelsky, M., & Galperin, M. Y.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-30
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 629-639
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2119129131
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.