The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA‐tagged proteins
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Degradation of ssrA‐tagged proteins is a central feature of protein‐quality control in all bacteria. In Escherichia coli, the ATP‐dependent ClpXP and ClpAP proteases are thought to participate in this process, but their relative contributions to degradation of ssrA‐tagged proteins in vivo have been uncertain because two adaptor proteins, ClpS and SspB, can modulate proteolysis of these substrates. Here, intracellular levels of these protease components and adaptors were determined during exponential growth and as cells entered early stationary phase. Levels of ClpA and ClpP increased about threefold during this transition, whereas ClpX, ClpS and SspB levels remained nearly constant. Using GFP‐ssrA expressed from the chromosome as a degradation reporter, the effects of altered concentrations of different protease components or adaptor proteins were explored. Both ClpXP and ClpAP degraded GFP‐ssrA in the cell, demonstrating that wild‐type levels of SspB and ClpS do not inhibit ClpAP completely. Upon entry into stationary phase, increased levels of ClpAP resulted in increased degradation of ssrA‐tagged substrates. As measured by maximum turnover rates, ClpXP degradation of GFP‐ssrA in vivo was significantly more efficient than in vitro. Surprisingly, ClpX‐dependent ClpP‐independent degradation of GFP‐ssrA was also observed. Thus, unfolding of this substrate by ClpX appears to enhance intracellular degradation by other proteases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA
Keiler, K. C., Waller, P. R. H., & Sauer, R. T. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5251.990 · Cited by 1,125
Self-citation
Cited by
j5 DNA Assembly Design Automation Software
Hillson, N. J., Rosengarten, R. D., & Keasling, J. D. (2012) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb2000116 · Cited by 316
Courbet, A., Endy, D., Renard, E., Molina, F., & Bonnet, J. (2015) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3601 · Cited by 266
Synthesis and degradation of FtsZ quantitatively predict the first cell division in starved bacteria
Sekar, K., Rusconi, R., Sauls, J. T., Fuhrer, T., Noor, E., Nguyen, J., Fernandez, V. I., Buffing, M. F., Berney, M., Jun, S., et al. (2018) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188623 · Cited by 58
Orthogonal Degron System for Controlled Protein Degradation in Cyanobacteria
Sakkos, J. K., Hernandez-Ortiz, S., Osteryoung, K. W., & Ducat, D. C. (2021) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.1c00035 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, C. M., Grossman, A. D., & Sauer, R. T.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-17
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1750-1761
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1844811650
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA‐tagged proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04798.x
- The paper
- Farrell, C. M., Grossman, A. D., & Sauer, R. T. (2005). Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA‐tagged proteins. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04798.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.