Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The nitrosative stress response of Staphylococcus aureus is required for resistance to innate immunity

Richardson, Anthony R., Dunman, Paul M., Fang, Ferric C.·2006·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Staphylococcus aureus is a highly virulent human pathogen with an extensive array of strategies to subvert the innate immune response. An important aspect of innate immunity is the production of the nitrogen monoxide radical (Nitric Oxide, NO·). Here we describe an adaptive response to nitrosative stress that allows S. aureus to replicate at high concentrations of NO·. Microarray analysis revealed 84 staphylococcal genes with significantly altered expression following NO· exposure. Of these, 30 are involved with iron‐homeostasis, potentially under the control of the Fur regulator. Another seven induced genes are involved in hypoxic/fermentative metabolism, including the flavohaemoprotein, Hmp. The SrrAB two‐component system has been shown to regulate the expression of many of the NO·‐induced metabolic genes. Indeed, inactivation of hmp, srrAB and fur resulted in heightened NO· sensitivity. Hmp was responsible for c. 90% of measurable staphylococcal NO· consumption and therefore critical for efficient NO· detoxification. While SrrAB was required for maximal hmp expression, srrAB mutants still exhibited significant NO· scavenging and NO·‐dependent induction of hmp. Yet S. aureus lacking SrrAB were more sensitive to nitrosative stress than hmp mutants, indicating that the contribution of SrrAB to NO· resistance extends beyond the regulation of hmp expression. Both Hmp and SrrAB were required for full virulence in a murine sepsis model, however, only the attenuation of the hmp mutant was restored by the abrogation of host NO· production. Thus, the S. aureus Hmp protein has evolved to serve as an iNOS‐dependent virulence determinant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05290.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, A. R., Dunman, P. M., & Fang, F. C.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-12
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
927-939
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2169227086
Cited by
240
References
4
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nitrosative stress response of Staphylococcus aureus is required for resistance to innate immunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05290.x
The paper
Richardson, A. R., Dunman, P. M., & Fang, F. C. (2006). The nitrosative stress response of Staphylococcus aureus is required for resistance to innate immunity. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05290.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.