The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The role of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is unclear. Some researchers have shown that quorum sensing is important for biofilm development, while others have indicated it has little or no role. In this study, the contribution of quorum sensing to biofilm development was found to depend upon the nutritional environment. Depending upon the carbon source, quorum‐sensing mutant strains ( lasIrhlI and lasRrhlR ) either exhibited a pronounced defect early in biofilm formation or formed biofilms identical to the wild‐type strain. Quorum sensing was then shown to exert its nutritionally conditional control of biofilm development through regulation of swarming motility. Examination of pilA and fliM mutant strains further supported the role of swarming motility in biofilm formation. These data led to a model proposing that the prevailing nutritional conditions dictate the contributions of quorum sensing and swarming motility at a key juncture early in biofilm development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Self-citationPukatzki, S., Kessin, R. H., & Mekalanos, J. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.052704399 · Cited by 289
Cited by
Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms
Karatan, E., & Watnick, P. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00041-08 · Cited by 1,048
The basics of bio-flocs technology: The added value for aquaculture
De Schryver, P., Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Boon, N., & Verstraete, W. (2008) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.02.019 · Cited by 914
Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions
Peleg, A. Y., Hogan, D. A., & Mylonakis, E. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2313 · Cited by 619
Barken, K. B., Pamp, S. J., Yang, L., Gjermansen, M., Bertrand, J. J., Klausen, M., Givskov, M., Whitchurch, C. B., Engel, J. N., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01658.x · Cited by 418
Self-citationShrout, J. D., & Nerenberg, R. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203933h · Cited by 339
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shrout, J. D., Chopp, D. L., Just, C. L., Hentzer, M., Givskov, M., & Parsek, M. R.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-24
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1264-1277
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2122094987
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05421.x
- The paper
- Shrout, J. D., Chopp, D. L., Just, C. L., Hentzer, M., Givskov, M., & Parsek, M. R. (2006). The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05421.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
