The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tolerance to the antimicrobial peptide colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms is linked to metabolically active cells, and depends on the pmr and mexAB‐oprM genes
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Bacteria living as biofilm are frequently reported to exhibit inherent tolerance to antimicrobial compounds, and might therefore contribute to the persistence of infections. Antimicrobial peptides are attracting increasing interest as new potential antimicrobial therapeutics; however, little is known about potential mechanisms, which might contribute to resistance or tolerance development towards these compounds in biofilms. Here we provide evidence that a spatially distinct subpopulation of metabolically active cells in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms is able to develop tolerance to the antimicrobial peptide colistin. On the contrary, biofilm cells exhibiting low metabolic activity were killed by colistin. We demonstrate that the subpopulation of metabolically active cells is able to adapt to colistin by inducing a specific adaptation mechanism mediated by the pmr operon, as well as an unspecific adaptation mechanism mediated by the mexAB‐oprM genes. Mutants defective in either pmr ‐mediated lipopolysaccharide modification or in mexAB‐oprM ‐mediated antimicrobial efflux were not able to develop a tolerant subpopulation in biofilms. In contrast to the observed pattern of colistin‐mediated killing in biofilms, conventional antimicrobial compounds such as ciprofloxacin and tetracycline were found to specifically kill the subpopulation of metabolically active biofilm cells, whereas the subpopulation exhibiting low metabolic activity survived the treatment. Consequently, targeting the two physiologically distinct subpopulations by combined antimicrobial treatment with either ciprofloxacin and colistin or tetracycline and colistin almost completely eradicated all biofilm cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W., & Stoodley, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro821 · Cited by 7,143
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?
Brogden, K. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1098 · Cited by 5,829
Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & William Costerton, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1 · Cited by 4,585
Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies
Hancock, R. E. W., & Sahl, H.-G. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1267 · Cited by 4,208
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O'toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,086
Lewis, K. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.999-1007.2001 · Cited by 1,980
Cited by
The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections
Bjarnsholt, T. (2013) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/apm.12099 · Cited by 1,080
Biofilm-Specific Antibiotic Resistance
Mah, T.-F. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.76 · Cited by 504
Tseng, B. S., Zhang, W., Harrison, J. J., Quach, T. P., Song, J. L., Penterman, J., Singh, P. K., Chopp, D. L., Packman, A. I., & Parsek, M. R. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12155 · Cited by 466
Antimicrobial Tolerance in Biofilms
Stewart, P. S. (2015) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mb-0010-2014 · Cited by 450
Barken, K. B., Pamp, S. J., Yang, L., Gjermansen, M., Bertrand, J. J., Klausen, M., Givskov, M., Whitchurch, C. B., Engel, J. N., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2008) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01658.x · Cited by 418
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pamp, S. J., Gjermansen, M., Johansen, H. K., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-28
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-240
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2149483355
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tolerance to the antimicrobial peptide colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms is linked to metabolically active cells, and depends on the pmr and mexAB‐oprM genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06152.x
- The paper
- Pamp, S. J., Gjermansen, M., Johansen, H. K., & Tolker‐Nielsen, T. (2008). Tolerance to the antimicrobial peptide colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms is linked to metabolically active cells, and depends on the pmr and mexAB‐oprM genes. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06152.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.