Cited by 126Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyEnzyme Structure and FunctionIron Metabolism and Disorders

Crystal structure of the Vibrio cholerae ferric uptake regulator (Fur) reveals insights into metal co‐ordination

Open access
Sheikh, Md. Arif, Taylor, Garry L.·2009·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The ferric uptake regulator (Fur) is a metal‐dependent DNA‐binding protein that acts as both a repressor and an activator of numerous genes involved in maintaining iron homeostasis in bacteria. It has also been demonstrated in Vibrio cholerae that Fur plays an additional role in pathogenesis, opening up the potential of Fur as a drug target for cholera. Here we present the crystal structure of V. cholerae Fur that reveals a very different orientation of the DNA‐binding domains compared with that observed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Fur. Each monomer of the dimeric Fur protein contains two metal binding sites occupied by zinc in the crystal structure. In the P. aeruginosa study these were designated as the regulatory site (Zn1) and structural site (Zn2). This V. cholerae Fur study, together with studies on Fur homologues and paralogues, suggests that in fact the Zn2 site is the regulatory iron binding site and the Zn1 site plays an auxiliary role. There is no evidence of metal binding to the cysteines that are conserved in many Fur homologues, including Escherichia coli Fur. An analysis of the metal binding properties shows that V. cholerae Fur can be activated by a range of divalent metals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06718.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crystallographic studies of E. coli Fur and its homologs revealed that Fur proteins may exist as a homodimer or a tetramer, with each monomer containing three metal-binding sites: site 1 (coordinated by His-87, Asp-89, Glu-108, and His-125) located within the dimerization domain; site 2 (coordinated by His-33, Glu-81, His-88, and His-90) connects the DNA-binding domain and the dimerization domain;

    “Crystallographic studies of E. coli Fur (10) and its homologs from other bacteria (11, 12, 13, 14, 15) revealed that Fur proteins may exist as a homodimer or a tetramer, with each monomer containing three metal-binding sites: site 1 (coordinated by His-87, Asp-89, Glu-108, and His-125) is located within the dimerization domain; site 2 (coordinated by His-33, Glu-81, His-88, and His-90) connects”

    From Binding of a [2Fe–2S] cluster drives dimerization of ferric uptake regulator (Fur) in Escherichia coli (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The overall holo-Fur structure from MSR-1 was similar to that from other prokaryotes, for example r.m.s.d.=1.9 Å compared with Vibrio cholerae.

    “The overall holo-Fur structure from MSR-1 was similar to that from other prokaryotes (for example, r.m.s.d.=1.9 Å compared with that from Vibrio cholerae ) 15 .”
  • Zinc ions were used in all previous Fur structures.

    “Zinc ions were used in all previous Fur structures 7 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheikh, M. A., & Taylor, G. L.
Affiliations
University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Garry L.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-22
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1208-1220
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2003090592
Cited by
126
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
Vibrio cholerae, ferric uptake regulator, Fur protein, crystal structure, zinc binding site, iron homeostasis, metalloregulation, bacterial pathogenesis, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Binding Sites, Cloning, Molecular, Metalloproteins, Metals, Repressor Proteins, Vibrio cholerae, Protein Structure, Tertiary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review