The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mass function and average mass-loss rate of dark matter subhaloes
Open accessAbstract
We present a simple, semi-analytical model to compute the mass functions of dark matter subhaloes. The masses of subhaloes at their time of accretion are obtained from a standard merger tree. During the subsequent evolution, the subhaloes experience mass loss due to the combined effect of dynamical friction, tidal stripping, and tidal heating. Rather than integrating these effects along individual subhalo orbits, we consider the average mass-loss rate, where the average is taken over all possible orbital configurations. Under the Ansatz that the average distribution of orbits is independent of parent halo mass, this allows us to write the average mass-loss rate as a simple function that depends only on redshift and on the instantaneous mass ratio of subhalo and parent halo. After calibrating this model by matching the subhalo mass function (SHMF) of cluster-sized dark matter haloes obtained from high-resolution, numerical simulations, we investigate the predicted mass and redshift dependence of the SHMF. We find that, contrary to previous claims, the subhalo mass function is not universal. Instead, both the slope and the normalization depend on the ratio of the parent halo mass, M, and the characteristic non-linear mass M*. This simply reflects a halo formation time dependence; more massive parent haloes form later, thus allowing less time for mass loss to operate. We predict that galaxy-sized haloes, with a present-day mass of M≃ 1012h−1 M⊙, have an average mass fraction of dark matter subhaloes that is a factor of 3 lower than for massive clusters with M≃ 1015h−1 M⊙. We also analyse the halo-to-halo scatter in SHMFs, and show that the subhalo mass fraction of individual haloes depends most strongly on their accretion history in the last ∼1 Gyr. Finally we provide a simple fitting function for the average SHMF of a parent halo of any mass at any redshift and for any cosmology, and briefly discuss several implications of our findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Direct Detection of Cold Dark Matter Substructure
Dalal, N., & Kochanek, C. S. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/340303 · Cited by 610
Cited by
Knollmann, S. R., & Knebe, A. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/608 · Cited by 889
The Dependence of Halo Clustering on Halo Formation History, Concentration, and Occupation
Wechsler, R. H., Zentner, A. R., Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Allgood, B. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/507120 · Cited by 567
Maccio, A. V., Dutton, A. A., Van Den Bosch, F. C., Moore, B., Potter, D., & Stadel, J. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11720.x · Cited by 553
Self-citationHopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Kereš, D., & Hernquist, L. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/524363 · Cited by 408
Shankar, F., Lapi, A., Salucci, P., De Zotti, G., & Danese, L. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/502794 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Bosch, F. C., Tormen, G., & Giocoli, C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 359
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1029-1040
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2005719734
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The mass function and average mass-loss rate of dark matter subhaloes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08964.x
- The paper
- van den Bosch, F. C., Tormen, G., & Giocoli, C. (2005). The mass function and average mass-loss rate of dark matter subhaloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08964.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.