The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Relationships between Galaxy Properties and Host Halo Mass, and the Role of Feedbacks in Galaxy Formation
Open accessAbstract
We present new relationships between halo masses ( M h ) and several galaxy properties, including r *-band luminosities ( L r ), stellar ( M star ) and baryonic masses, stellar velocity dispersions (σ), and black hole masses ( M BH ). Approximate analytic expressions are given. In the galaxy halo mass range 3 × 10 10 M ☉ ≤ M h ≤ 3 × 10 13 M ☉ the M h - L r , M star - M h , and M BH - M h relations are well represented by a double power law, with a break at M h ,break ≈ 3 × 10 11 M ☉ , corresponding to a mass in stars M star ~ 1.2 × 10 10 M ☉ , to an r *-band luminosity L r ~ 5 × 10 9 L ☉ , to a stellar velocity dispersion σ ≃ 88 km s -1 , and to a black hole mass M BH ~ 9 × 10 6 M ☉ . The σ- M h relation can be approximated by a single power law, although a double power law is a better representation. Although there are significant systematic errors associated with our method, the derived relationships are in good agreement with the available observational data and have comparable uncertainties. We interpret these relations in terms of the effect of feedback from supernovae and from the active nucleus on the interstellar medium. We argue that the break of the power laws occurs at a mass that marks the transition between the dominance of the stellar and the AGN feedback.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The Luminosity Function and Stellar Evolution.
Salpeter, E. E. (1955) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145971 · Cited by 8,697
Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation
Press, W. H., & Schechter, P. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152650 · Cited by 4,916
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. (1978) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · Cited by 3,919
Large-scale bias and the peak background split
Sheth, R. K., & Tormen, G. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02692.x · Cited by 2,783
The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation
Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Filippenko, A. V., Green, R., Grillmair, C., Ho, L. C., et al. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/341002 · Cited by 2,617
Stellar masses and star formation histories for 105galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Simon White, D. M., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., Brinchmann, J., Bruzual, G., Peng, E. W., Seibert, M., Bernardi, M., et al. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x · Cited by 2,417
Galaxy formation through hierarchical clustering
White, S. D. M., & Frenk, C. S. (1991) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/170483 · Cited by 2,354
Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment
Bullock, J. S., Kolatt, T. S., Sigad, Y., Somerville, R. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A., Primack, J. R., & Dekel, A. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x · Cited by 2,319
Cited by
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Harris, W. E., Harris, G. L. H., & Alessi, M. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/82 · Cited by 306
The dichotomy of dark matter fraction and total mass density slope of galaxies over five dex in mass
Tortora, C., Posti, L., Koopmans, L. V. E., & Napolitano, N. R. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2320 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Shankar, F., Lapi, A., Salucci, P., De Zotti, G., & Danese, L.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2006-05-20
- Volume
- 643
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-25
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2049402142
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Relationships between Galaxy Properties and Host Halo Mass, and the Role of Feedbacks in Galaxy Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/502794
- The paper
- Shankar, F., Lapi, A., Salucci, P., De Zotti, G., & Danese, L. (2006). New Relationships between Galaxy Properties and Host Halo Mass, and the Role of Feedbacks in Galaxy Formation. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/502794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.