Cited by 77Astro and Planetary ScienceSpacecraft Dynamics and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability limits for the quasi-satellite orbit

Open access
Mikkola, S., Innanen, K., Wiegert, P., Connors, M., Brasser, R.·2006·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

An asteroid moving around the Sun having approximately the same mean motion and mean longitude as a planet, but a different eccentricity, circles the planet like a retrograde satellite even when the distance is large enough so that it is not a bound satellite. If the orbits are coplanar, then the motion is stable in the secular approximation. When the orbits are inclined enough, an asteroid can be trapped into such a quasi-satellite (QS) motion for a finite period of time. The conditions under which this can occur are discussed, improved criteria for the recognition of this type of motion are developed, and numerical examples from real QS objects are provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10306.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 164207 was recognized as a relatively long-lived quasi-satellite companion to Earth by Connors et al. (2004), and its dynamics was further studied by Mikkola et al. (2006) and Wajer (2010).

    “Asteroid 164207 was recognized as a relatively long-lived quasi-satellite companion to the Earth by Connors et al. (2004) and its dynamics was further studied by Mikkola et al. (2006) and Wajer (2010).”

    From Asteroid 2014 OL339: yet another Earth quasi-satellite (2014) · cites this paper as Mikkola et al. 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lidov, 1994, Astron. Lett., 20, 676
  2. Lidov, 1994, Astron. Lett., 20, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mikkola, S., Innanen, K., Wiegert, P., Connors, M., & Brasser, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • York University (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Athabasca University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2006-05-08
Volume
369
Issue
1
Pages
15-24
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2030503385
Cited by
77
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
quasi-satellite orbits, asteroid orbits, orbital stability, orbital inclination, secular approximation, orbital resonance, retrograde motion, mean motion, mean longitude

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review