Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing

Open access
Mandelbaum, Rachel, Seljak, Uroš, Cool, Richard J., Blanton, Michael, Hirata, Christopher M., Brinkmann, Jonathan·2006·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present results of a measurement of the shape of the density profile of galaxy groups and clusters traced by 43 335 Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) with spectroscopic redshifts from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The galaxies are selected such that they are the brightest within a cylindrical aperture, split into two luminosity samples and modelled as the sum of stellar and dark matter components. We present a detailed investigation of many possible systematic effects that could contaminate our signal and develop methods to remove them, including a detected intrinsic alignment for galaxies within 100 h−1 kpc of LRGs which we remove using photometric redshift information. The resulting lensing signal is consistent with NFW (Navarro, Frenk & White) profile dark matter haloes; the singular isothermal sphere (SIS) profile is ruled out at the 96 (conservatively) and 99.96 per cent confidence level (CL) for the fainter and brighter lens samples (respectively) when we fit using lensing data between 0.4 and 2 h−1 Mpc with total signal-to-noise ratio of 19 and 25 for the two lens samples. The lensing signal amplitude suggests that the faint and bright sample galaxies typically reside in haloes of mass (2.9 ± 0.4) × 1013 and (6.7 ± 0.8) × 1013 h−1 M⊙, respectively, in good agreement with predictions based on halo spatial density with normalization lower than the ‘concordance’σ8= 0.9. When fitting for the concentration parameter in the NFW profile, we find c= 5.0 ± 0.6 (stat) ± 1 (sys), and c= 5.6 ± 0.6 (stat) ± 1 (sys) for the faint and bright samples, consistent with Λ cold dark matter (CDM) simulations. We also split the bright sample further to determine masses and concentrations for cluster-mass haloes, finding mass (1.3 ± 0.2) × 1014 h−1 M⊙ for the sample of LRGs brighter than −22.6 in r. We establish that on average there is a correlation between the halo mass and central galaxy luminosity relation that scales as M∝L2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10906.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Cool, R. J., Blanton, M., Hirata, C. M., & Brinkmann, J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2006-10-21
Volume
372
Issue
2
Pages
758-776
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2120682883
Cited by
244
References
8
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10906.x
The paper
Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Cool, R. J., Blanton, M., Hirata, C. M., & Brinkmann, J. (2006). Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10906.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.