The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An energy-conserving formalism for adaptive gravitational force softening in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and N-body codes
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we describe an adaptive softening length formalism for collisionless N-body and self-gravitating smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) calculations which conserves momentum and energy exactly. This means that spatially variable softening lengths can be used in N-body calculations without secular increases in energy. The formalism requires the calculation of a small additional term to the gravitational force related to the gradient of the softening length. The extra term is similar in form to the usual SPH pressure force (although opposite in direction) and is therefore straightforward to implement in any SPH code at almost no extra cost. For N-body codes, some additional cost is involved as the formalism requires the computation of the density through a summation over neighbouring particles using the smoothing kernel. The results of numerical tests demonstrate that, for homogeneous mass distributions, the use of adaptive softening lengths gives a softening which is always close to the ‘optimal’ choice of fixed softening parameter, removing the need for fine-tuning. For a heterogeneous mass distribution (as may be found in any large-scale N-body simulation), we find that the errors on the least-dense component are lowered by an order of magnitude compared to the use of a fixed softening length tuned to the densest component. For SPH codes, our method presents a natural and an elegant choice of softening formalism which makes a small improvement to both the force resolution and the total energy conservation at almost zero additional cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Cited by
SPLASH: An Interactive Visualisation Tool for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Simulations
Price, D. J. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07022 · Cited by 746
Self-citationPhantom: A Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics Code for Astrophysics
Price, D. J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T. S., Nixon, C., Toupin, S., Pettitt, A., Chan, C., Mentiplay, D., Laibe, G., Glover, S., et al. (2018) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2018.25 · Cited by 429
Self-citationCosmological Simulations of Quasar Fueling to Subparsec Scales Using Lagrangian Hyper-refinement
Anglés-Alcázar, D., Quataert, E., Hopkins, P. F., Somerville, R. S., Hayward, C. C., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Bryan, G. L., Kereš, D., Hernquist, L., & Stone, J. M. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac09e8 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, D. J., & Monaghan, J. J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1347-1358
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1975112881
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An energy-conserving formalism for adaptive gravitational force softening in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and N-body codes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11241.x
- The paper
- Price, D. J., & Monaghan, J. J. (2007). An energy-conserving formalism for adaptive gravitational force softening in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and N-body codes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11241.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.