Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the star formation rate - brightest cluster relation: estimating the peak star formation rate in post-merger galaxies

Open access
Bastian, N.·2008·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We further the recent discussion on the relation between the star formation rate (SFR) of a galaxy and the luminosity of its brightest star cluster (SFR versus MbrightestV). We first show that the observed trend of SFR versus MbrightestV is due to the brightest cluster in a galaxy being preferentially young (≤15 Myr – for a constant SFR) and hence a good tracer of the current SFR, although we give notable exceptions to this rule. Archival Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging of high-SFR galaxies, as well as additional galaxies/clusters from the literature, is used to further confirm the observed trend. Using a series of Monte Carlo simulations, we show that a pure power-law mass function with index α= 2 is ruled out by the current data. Instead, we find that a Schechter function (i.e. a power law with an exponential truncation at the high-mass end) provides an excellent fit to the data. Additionally, these simulations show that bound cluster formation (in M⊙ yr−1) represents only ∼8±3 per cent of the total star formation within a galaxy, independent of the SFR. From this, we conclude that there is only a single mode of cluster formation which operates over at least 6 orders of magnitude in the SFR. We provide a simple model of star/cluster formation feedback within dwarf galaxies (and star-forming complexes within spirals) which highlights the strong impact that a massive cluster can have on its surroundings. Using this relation, we can extrapolate backwards in time in order to estimate the peak SFR of major merger galaxies, such as NGC 7252, 1316 and 3610. The derived SFRs for these galaxies are between a few hundred and a few thousand solar masses per year. The inferred far-infrared luminosity of the galaxies, from the extrapolated SFR, places them well within the range of ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) and for NGC 7252 within the hyperluminous infrared galaxy (HLIRG) regime. Thus, we provide evidence that these post-merger galaxies passed through a ULIRG/HLIRG phase and are now evolving passively. Using the current and extrapolated past SFR of NGC 34, we infer that the ULIRG phase of this galaxy has lasted for at least 150 Myr.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Bastian, N.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2008-10-21
Volume
390
Issue
2
Pages
759-768
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2066034174
Cited by
212
References
1
FWCI
8.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the star formation rate - brightest cluster relation: estimating the peak star formation rate in post-merger galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x
The paper
Bastian, N. (2008). On the star formation rate - brightest cluster relation: estimating the peak star formation rate in post-merger galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.